English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I need to pick a side and i need some very major points and good arguements ... keep the policy on WMDs strict or should we change it? why?

2006-07-23 16:18:32 · 3 answers · asked by anonymus 1 in Politics & Government Politics

3 answers

i have recently posted this but you can use it as long as you site me.


There were never any wmds and the president knows it, it was just something used to gain support for the invasion of iraq, do you honestly think that if the president knew that iraq had wmds he would have sent a ground invasion force to iraq , such an action against a country that has wmds would have instilled unacceptable losses of our troops cause if sadam had wmds he would have used them against us since he knows he would be tried for his crimes against the kurds and he has nothing to lose, and if history teaches us anything countries with nukes dont get invaded why dont you think anyone has done anything about isreal , i mean they have nukes and they have violate tons of u.n. resolutions.

2006-07-23 16:26:18 · answer #1 · answered by hawkeyes 3 · 0 0

Ok.. WMD's exist... the USA has a LOT of them...

now... some countries have enough scientists and money to develop their own WMD's... but.. once they are developed and constructed... they do not necessarily have the stability nor the security to protect those WMD's from being misused...

say by terrorists for example...

now... if you are talking Nuclear WMD's... they affect the whole world.. if just ONE is set off it will affect everyone in the world in some way...

many countries call the USA hypocrits because we have nuclear weapons and don't want others to have them... and.. we are the only country that has used them in war to date (as far as I know)...

Who are these people that are trying to develop WMD's going to use them on? and what are their criteria?... will they use them the instant some other country attacks them?...

sometimes I fear that the USA will be attacked by someone that does not know our capabilities... and we WILL turn their country into a glazed over parking lot... and the USA is a pretty stable country compared to many in the world... so what would it take for WMD's be used?

2006-07-23 23:29:25 · answer #2 · answered by ♥Tom♥ 6 · 0 0

WMD in the hands of USA will keep the world safe.
WMD in the hands of bad guys, its the end of the world.

2006-07-23 23:26:14 · answer #3 · answered by American Superman 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers