Has anybody heard of anti-gravity experiments in America, Australia, England?

Question

gravity machines? Machines that use gravity as a drift for energy?

Dan S, your kind will be the downfall of the human race...

You follow rules, and learn thousands of rules, yet you know nothing. And the worst part about it, is that your dumb.

You see, words are only associations, things by which you associate a thought...

obviously, whoever cornered the "anti-gravity phrasing, had in mind you picturing something that would not be pushed or pulled to the ground as all things that we view around us on Earth do.

It does not mean "against gravity" you IDIOT.

Don't you see that this rule following agenda is what NWO (new world order) wants you to do? so that you do not look into what is REALLY going on---they want to turn everyone on Earth into rule following robots. So they can manipulate everything with legal clauses and wording to control the population...that coupled with the media and advertising...

The NWO is in contact with the other alien race from space ( I concider us the good guys).

Let me give you a little thought experiment that will not fit into your rule-following agenda:

If you look at the laws of physics, the conservation of energy principle states that energy can neither be created nor destroyed...only transformed...

Ok?

Then it states that energy = The amount of work done

and work is given a formula, etc, etc.

However think of this:

A huge ball going through a tube that goes through the center of the Earth and out the other side....The ball goes back and forth between the two ends of the earth...over and over again.

This means this object would be moving, without any 'work' being excerted on it---

how can this be? How does science justify the motion that results when an object falls to the ground, to make the conservation of energy meet its end?

I know, lets call it, potential energy? what kind of crap is that..

kinetic energy is motion, I see that, but potentinal energy is a load of crap--There ARE times when you can get

energy gaps. And I know this FROM PERSONAL experience.

go into wikipedia and put "gravitomagnetism"

Its a well known science. Things that are in motion excert an "inertial wave" just as particles excert magnetic waves on their sorroundings. Einstein, before he died, tried to unify gravity and electromagnetism.

I beleive he did, successfully, but he worked with people beyond your current knowledge.

Answer 1

Einstein like me, actually preferred geometrical models to math, as math is more open to misinterpretation by designation of certain forces or other formula designator symbols with the wrong factor. Math can be made to say anything, but scientific correctness though experimentation should be thorough.. As for Einstein , he looked at gravity as being the warping of space due to mass and it's density. The end formulas actually tied in very nicely with some of Newton's formulas, that defined the inverse law of Gravitational attraction between any two or more masses at defined distances.
I have built and designed a number of Gravitationally interactive propulsion systems in the past. Gravitational Propulsion for short. The NSF has reviewed some of my designs, and favorably at that. Wikipedia has an entry for Antigravity, but it is in disarray, and controversial by it's own admission. They do however have a few lines about an ESA report on a study that did show after repeated tests that there was a gravitational effect created due to superconductive and gyroscopic behaviors.
As for the confusion in the electric/gravitational statements; that sort of error has been creeping into multiple areas of gravitational studies by a wide number of theorists, and really downgrades the study of gravitational effects. For instance there is one group of researchers that is building "Lifters", these are electrically charged objects that actually do fly through ionic propulsion, but that is an electrodynamic effect, not gravitational in nature, and yet they claim it is gravitational, but of course when factored into mathematical equations as a gravity effect the math is all messed up unless it is treated as an electro-ionic effect. Calling one thing another has led to numerous confusions in theoretical study and led researchers in other fields to discount the math of any gravitational studies in propulsion theory because of incorrect combination of different forces in prior studies.I will try to include a link to a pdf on Einstein's work in the relationships between electromagnetic and gravitational fields. The fact that he was able to designate certain gravitational effects without an explanation as to intervening theory is curious as it seems to go beyond a simple leap of logic, almost as though he knew more than what he was willing to say. However, in the end an absolute unified theory was not announced, and yet we often miss apply certain cross references between gravity and electromagnetism as though the full answer has been disclosed, and end up with really screwed up results. Quantum and String theory has even made things worse. I think since the publication of "not even wrong" by Peter Woit, String theory will at last fade away. But back to Einstein, and reading more into what was wrote than was wrote; there may be a possibility that Einstein had seen the dangers of certain discoveries and therefore responded with his gravitational concepts and yet in a way, perhaps miss directed research in order to protect us from our own follies. The Gravitational equations are astounding , but much of the electromagnetics is somehow odd. Remember he always said "God does not play dice with the universe" in regards to quantum theory, and I can't get away from the idea that he knew a lot more than he was willing to tell.

I had at one time four different research groups on the internet dedicated to Antigravity and Gravitational Propulsion research. Several months ago I shut down all of my online research groups because of the FCC ruling that effected confidentiality of all online activity, hence removing all of the confidential materials that had been posted in private areas of the groups. I still do private research , but the secret stuff is all off line now, none the less, I have reopened public discussion groups at the old addresses of some of the earlier groups for forum activity on public data and news on this line of research.
This just to say that there are actual devices that do work, a prototype beats any theory that says it can't be done, I am reminded of the Wright brothers who were faced with absolute theoretical proofs done by reputable scientists of their time, that man could never fly, it was just mathematically impossible to fly. Yes sir, that ain't a fact.
Mystery
PS I am open to being contacted if any wish to further discuss these areas of knowledge in private, but understand that there are areas I won't talk about due to confidentiality concerns. But I will talk about more than most.

Answer 2

NO, antigravity is a myth and probably can’t even exist.

Einstein’s Unified Field Theory: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unified_Field_Theory
Combines all the fundamental forces in the Universe into one force. By Einstein’s day there were four forces, and now days we have it down to two forces. Electromagnetic and Gravity.

There is no anti-electricity, and there is no anti-magnetism. Electrons flow from the negative pole to the positive pole, and magnetism flows from the northern pole to the southern pole. There is no way to reverse the field or to make electrons flow backward. Sure you can change the potentials to reverse the current, but you are only changing the location of the negative source.

If Einstein is right, and he hasn't been proven wrong yet. Then gravity and electromagnetism are the same fundamental force, an attractive force that flows in one direction ONLY. There is no anti-force or antigravity. That is just someone's pipe dream. According to our most basic understanding of physics antigravity is impossible.

Answer 3

I'm working on it when I'm not answering questions.

my invention/experiment combines all the essential ingredients of physics in a beautiful simple way... look for me in the news in the next year if I don't get rubbed out!

note we do not yet understand gravity... so the potential energy of an object moved beyond the earth centre (note work done) is also impossible to define.

Cheers.

Answer 4

Yes Nasa is trying right now to create artificial gravity, or course I'm not telling wether there succeding or not. And it is logical other goverements are also trying. Machines that use gravity as a drift for energy have already been made, you know those mobile things that keep going and going and going. Well thats exactly what they're doing.

Answer 5

If you were able to produce the exact opposite gravitational wave as you were being effected by (like how sound canceling technology works) you could nullify gravity.

Answer 6

There was at one time in the 80s a Russian scientist, whose name escapes me, that supposedly tested anti-gravity. You may do a google search on this. He claimed his experiments resulted in success, but it killed his professional career.

Answer 7

Yes, but it was 20 years ago and it involved Quarts Cristal somehow and don't ask me how because I don't know. Not only that, I would probably be investigated by the FBI if I said any more.