What is the greater threat? Global warming, or terrorism? Why?

Answer 1

Terrorism is primarily a man-made (though I do not consider terrorists human) problem.
Global Warming is primarily a natural process...but it has been accelerated by human activities.

In the end...both are threats that must be dealt immediately with if humanity is to even have a chance of survival.

Answer 2

Terrorism is the greatest threat because it is very uncertain of whom it is that is the terrorist. The victims of a terrorist attach's are multiple and varied so much that there doesn't really seem to be a viable perpetrator. When there is war there are victims on each side so in that case just who is the terrorist? He who threw the first punch? After Jesus came and taught the people how to live in peace with one another, that eye for an eye thing was old school. We know global warming is a problem and it should concern all on earth but it is something tan gable we can put our finger on and know this. We should learn to know our enemies and learn them well, whether it be global warming or terrorism. There are many Ted Bundies aka terrorists who plan and act out horrendous deeds. Look at Teddy. "He was a good guy". There is no greater threat. But make no mistake, you can not tell who is the true terrorist.

Answer 3

Terrorism is a much greater threat. All you have to do is look at how many people it has killed in the past year alone. As for global warming, there is a slight myth to it. It does exist, but it is only a trend that has been occuring since the earth formed. Ask any geologist, biologist, chemist, etc.-- global warming trends have been occuring for billions of years. This happens to be a peak period, many of which have occurred before. We are not causing global warming. In some aspects, we may be aiding the process, but it was going to happen because it has always happened. People who tell you otherwise are denying definite points of the history of our planet. Don't believe the hype and drive your SUV because it was going to happen. Fight terrorism, not trend.

Answer 4

Terrorism, because global warming is a natural cycle of the Earth. We may be able to slow it, but it can not be stopped. Terrorism is a more immediate threat.

Answer 5

You theory incorrect. Terrorism isn't something new. it is extreme, very extreme... besides the undeniable fact that it is not any longer the finest possibility to mankind. you're wondering too small. the obtrusive best possibility to mankind is any disaster, organic or guy-made, which impacts the planet without delay. in this class must be... - A critically sized meteor hitting the planet. (which will ultimately take position.) - An all-out thermonuclear conflict (which with any success we are able to circumvent). - massive climate change, no matter if guy-made or no longer. there is significant data at present that CO2 is increasing the temperature of the planet in an brilliant way, and those alterations ought to reason massive fatalities global. they have already led to a wide selection in case you concentration on significant storms like Katrina. See, that global warming is happening isn't up for debate. that is happening. How a lot of that is human-proper and how a lot is organic is up for debate, yet there is little doubt that a number of that is led to by guy. in case you imagine that Osama is an better possibility than the elements turning out to be inhospitable to mankind, you've neglected the boat someplace. even extra-so in case you class Obama with Osama... See, liberals compared to conservatives can concentration on better than one possibility at a time. Classifying global warming as a spectacular possibility would not declassify terrorism as attainable to our society. it is pretty straight forward... global warming = possibility to the international... Terrorism = possibility to our society. international > Society in length. Mankind > our Society besides, in case you count number everyone (and being a conservative, i'm no longer particular in case you concentration on all people human beings, you should no longer.) Edit: "The earth has replaced temperatures in the course of the billions of years it is been round - undergo in options the ICE AGE everybody? Who led to that - we weren't even right here!" Umm...hi! no matter if guy-made or no longer, climate change ought to nevertheless be catastrophic... no matter if warming or ice age... or do you want residing less than a glacier?

Answer 6

To us, neither. The dumbest person I ever saw was in Cincinnati, two years after 9/11. A news reporter (who else) was asking people on the street if they felt more or less safe after 9/11. This dippy woman actually said she was scared of a terrorist attack. In Cincinnati. Please. Terrorists want New York, Chicago, or LA. They are NOT interested in Cincinnati OH. Nobody in the US cares about Cincinnati. In fact, they'd be doing us a favor wiping the place out. Worried about Global Warming? Only retarded people think that anyone alive today is ever going to see the negative effects of global warming.

Answer 7

At the time it would be terrorism because that has an instant impact. But in the long run it will definitely be global warming because we could all be gone.

Answer 8

Terrorism considering that many people have no respect for peace. Terrorists strike anywhere and anytime to drum up their issues. Global warming is being addressed to by many people and governments. I believe that this could be solved unlike terrorism.

Answer 9

terrorism, it is a known threat, with obvious enemies

global warming is not even agreed to that it is a problem
and it is certainly not agreed that we are the cause/
And of course since we can never make China, Russia, Korea ever agree to fixing it ( if we really could, if we really caused it)

So basicly there has to be research that there is even a global warming,

So one is a real threat, the other is not even agreed to be a threat

Answer 10

,I have read many reports and studies that show this apparent correlation. As a skeptic, the first question that comes to mind is, does temperature follow Co2 or Co2 follow temperature? Or are they a result of something else happening? I simply ask show me the study that says a 200,000 year old ice core is not going to have the quantity of Co2 change over time {not to mention pressure}. It is a fact that water is a Co2 sink. Ice is water below 32 deg, another fact. What is their correlation? Does the trapped air simply remain inert, or does the sink processes continue at a much slower rate. I have not found that answer in any unbiased report that didn’t start out with {if we don’t do something we going to distroy the planet}