both in there prime
2006-07-23 14:55:35 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Basketball
BOYKINS BABY SPUD SUCKED
2006-07-23 15:08:36 · answer #1 · answered by pepsikiss 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
I pick spud webb over Boykins.
2006-07-23 15:10:51 · answer #2 · answered by carlos d 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
spud webb
the better playa on both ends of the court
Boykins comes close, but he doesnt have a legacy like Spud Webb does
in the battle of the short guys, Spud Wins
2006-07-23 15:48:19 · answer #3 · answered by beezy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
spud webb would dunk over earl boykins the whole time... spud would win easily.
2006-07-23 15:11:23 · answer #4 · answered by Anthony B 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Spud can dunk sure, but Boykins can do just about everything else better.
2006-07-23 17:22:03 · answer #5 · answered by Big Z 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I say boykins because dunking was all spud could do. Boykins is stronger, faster, quicker, better shooter, better defender. Oh and did i mention he was faster. WAY FASTER. He is faster than Nash.
2006-07-23 16:12:33 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
who cares if earl can bench 350 lbs its not like hes going to tackle spud or push him away. It all comes down to who has the upper advantage but I think SPud would come away with it because of his ups and height which helps on offense but ups and longer arms will make it easier to block earl's shots
2006-07-23 15:45:34 · answer #7 · answered by moubarak35@sbcglobal.net 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Boykins. He is a lot stronger than he looks plus he is really fast and can shoot well
2006-07-24 04:46:42 · answer #8 · answered by #15mwu 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no doubt, spudd webb would just jump over earl boykins and thunder dunk
2006-07-23 15:01:36 · answer #9 · answered by carmen h/joey h 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
boykins. hands down. i heard on sportcenter a while back he benched somewhere around 350..
2006-07-23 14:57:13 · answer #10 · answered by Alex R 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋