2006-07-23 13:22:42 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Of course not. He was rallying the lebanese people to ask Syria to withdraw its 15000 troops just a few months ago. Now he's saying that Israel should be allowed to attack lebanon (and freely destroy airports, hospitals, and bridges). You'd think this attack was planned long before. If Syrian troops were still in lebanon, israel would have a run for its money.
2006-07-23 13:27:05 · answer #1 · answered by FIONEX 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I wouldn't trust Bush's judgment on yesterday's weather report
2006-07-23 20:34:24 · answer #2 · answered by iknowtruthismine 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What would you have done? It was widely believed Saddam had WMDs. We know he used them -- we saw the dead bodies -- he did not prove he destroyed the rest of the WMDs as he was ordered to do by the UN - he would not allow inspections for 4 years - are you one of the people who says there never were any? I only hope we find them before the terrorists do.
2006-07-23 20:28:29 · answer #3 · answered by TheHumbleOne 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
sure if good means, dumbest idea in the history of time, including ones made by dogs
2006-07-23 20:29:45 · answer #4 · answered by jjissodamngreat 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ihit was NOT widely known that Sadam had weapons of mass destruction, especially not in the white house
2006-07-23 20:30:06 · answer #5 · answered by Vahan 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
When was Bush's judgement on ANYTHING a good thing ... :(
2006-07-23 20:25:04 · answer #6 · answered by Sashie 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Good enough for me.
2006-07-23 20:31:26 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
good thing
2006-07-23 20:25:38 · answer #8 · answered by Mopar Muscle Gal 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
OF COURSE NOT BUSH IS SUPID!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2006-07-23 20:26:24 · answer #9 · answered by Brianna V 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
YES!!!
2006-07-23 20:36:24 · answer #10 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋