English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Conservative policy has lead to the deaths of millions of babies and children. Lies to get America involved in Iraq have killed countless children.

Imbargo's on dictators countries that hurt babies and children but not government.

Destroying programs that help infants and children.

And now conservatives may be part of the blame for thousands of Iraqi babies killed when Reagan, Bush, Rumsfeld decided to give weapons to Saddam.

If conservatives are responsible for death and destruction of babies and children, shouldn't they be shutting their big mouths? Should they start to practice what they preach just once?

And forget about using the old "your a liberal" excuse to ditch out of the question. I can't stand liberals, their not much better then conservatives.

And try to minimize the old "blame Clinton because Bush is a moron" routine. Nobody really buys that one anymore. People see it as a diversion tactic to shift blame to someone else.

2006-07-23 10:11:59 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

18 answers

I am pro-life without exception, and I am 100% against the war in Iraq. I didn't vote for Bush and I don't support him. I am dismayed that other conservative Christians do. Your criticism is fair.

If you are at all interested in the topic of abortion, I recommend http://Abort73.com

2006-07-25 07:40:01 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

1. Cite your sources to prove that the war in Iraq has killed more unborn babies than 30 plus years of Roe V Wade.

2. Not ALL conservatives hate abortion.

3. Pro-Life means just that. If a conservative (or liberal) believes abortion is wrong it does not automatically mean they believe war is right.

I do not think the war in Iraq is right and most people I know despise the war with all of its death just as much as they do abortion.

2006-07-23 10:19:39 · answer #2 · answered by Cybeq 5 · 0 0

Well, obviously it's only OK to kill children when they're developed enough to know what's happening to them, to think, and to feel pain. Before that it's murder.

It's not OK to kill a future baby even when the welfare of another child is at stake (ex. a young teen who was impregnated as the result of rape), but by all means kill infants and children who are already born in the interest of gaining oil.

It's OK to destroy embryos left over from fertility treatments like IVF, but if you try to use some cells from one of those embryos to save countless lives and improve the quality of life for countless more living, breating human beings, then it becomes murder.

With logic like that, how could anyone question the Republican agenda?

2006-07-23 10:21:08 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

That still doesn't make abortion alright. You can't justify the death of unborn infants by bringing up the death of more children. I don't believe in abortion and i don't believe in killing helpless children in war. I support the troops and I am behind helping the people of Iraq, but I think the war has gone too far.

2006-07-23 10:18:33 · answer #4 · answered by ekaty84 5 · 0 0

Conservatives are against abortion because most of them feel life begins at conception. To abort is murder.

The believe(d) in Iraq because they believe that the duty of the American people is to spread freedom to other nations so that the oppressed can have the same freedoms we have. It may sound like bull to you, but the believe whole heartily that everyone should have what we have here (other than nukes) and that the best way to get that freedom is through war.

2006-07-23 10:18:10 · answer #5 · answered by emp04 5 · 0 0

Guess you will need to ask the conservative fundamentalist Muslims to answer your question.

The USA doesn't send babies to Iraq to fight the enemies of democracy there. It sends soldiers.

Your set of questions are little more than poorly thought out emotional questions that are asked for no other reason than the desparate poltical attempt by the Democrats to regain control of some power in the federal government. No one is fooled by your claim you cannot stand liberals.

2006-07-23 10:18:41 · answer #6 · answered by Alan Turing 5 · 0 0

WRONG.

Do you know how many MILLIONS OF BABIES have been killed by abortions?

Why do liberals think intentionally killing a baby is the right thing to do?

Conservatives are not just for war. Liberals should be in favor of a just war as well.

Wars are meant to defeat evil regimes (Hitler, Mussolini, Viet Cong, Saddam Hussein, Taliban).

Aren't liberals embarrassed that they favor abortion and make excuses for dictators?

2006-07-23 10:15:51 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

why do they hate abortion? I wish I knew...I really think pro-life is almost wrong. I mean, I tend to think of myself as leaning more towards the conservative side for the base fact that you can't please everybody....but really, everybody does NOT mean allowing everybody to simply make babies, to make more mouths to feed, and our natural resources and all other resources are really and truly strained enough. Rather than bring new life into our world at such an exponential rate, why can't we slow down, and try and save some of the lives that are endangered today?

He's been in the White house for 6 years and finally uses his first Veto on Stem Cells? I really want to know what he thinks is gained from that!

That's my take

2006-07-23 10:24:50 · answer #8 · answered by paratechfan 3 · 0 0

As a conservative , i'm against maximum abortions -pretty ones used as birth control. pretty it ought to correctly be left to the mum - yet adoption must be kinder than lack of existence. i do not love conflict yet am lifelike, conflict occurs even as international places won't be able to agree and threats are made. that is why each and every us of a has a military - no longer purely to have parades and amazing uniforms. I also understand the version between a educated soldier prepared to live on and a fetus nestled in its mom's womb . purely so that you recognize -- I help the shortcoming of existence penalty for man or woman offenders who did not care about ripping the existence out ( that looks merciless to me) of their possibility free sufferer/victims . wish i replaced into able to spice up your superiority complicated. you could now sit decrease back and pat your self on the decrease back and experience solid about your smugness. a minimum of your style in song isn't undesirable - purely dated.

2016-10-15 03:12:55 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

True on all counts.

Conservatives love to save the fetus then send it to death when it's 18 or 19 years old.

Hel1 they'd save a ton o' money on food and education if they just killed them at birth.

2006-07-23 10:15:17 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers