Do you think wrestlers should have 100% control over angles and storylines for themselves?

Answer 1

Maybe not 100% control, but at least half. Wrestlers should be able to have a say in gimmicks and storyline ideas, especialy those that are at risk of getting let go because "creative didn't have anything for them". They should also be allowed to disagree with a storyline idea. I'm sure if Kane were allowed a say, he never would've been placed in that God-awful Katie Vick storyline.

Answer 2

Of course not. That would be like giving control of a fortune 500 company to the folks in the mail room. Just because you actually do the work doesn't mean you can provide the necessary vision to direct the company, or in this case, the angle and direction your character should have. Just because you can sell a move doesn't mean you can make the story behind it interesting.

Answer 3

Yes and thats what makes it such a farce.. While entertaining it really isn't wrestling in the true meaning of the "sport" . They should at least have a good portion of a say in how it is acted out. Just like in any staged production the actors should have some imput into their scripts.

Answer 4

Only when they own 100% of the company.

Answer 5

sometimes they should, but again it would cause to many problems..

i feel some should have a lot of input of what they want to do and etc with their charatcher, but it is hard to statisfy 100 wrestlers who work for a company..

Answer 6

I know they don't have any say in the storyline and they should. They don't even have the say on who is going to win. The only say they have is how the match is going to go. Like........ I'll do this to you and you that to me then we'll both do this.

Answer 7

NO BECUSE THEY MIGHT BAC STOREYLINES BUT ABOUT 25%

Answer 8

no

Answer 9

no

Answer 10

not really