at least he should intellectually insult him now and then, he'd never know anyway
2006-07-23 06:11:11 · 15 answers · asked by Richelou 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
That is not true.
Bush took Blair in the best 2 out of 3 falls in a WWF cage match.
He might be a little guy with a history of being sneaky But Dick Chaney has taught him how to Wrestle.
2006-07-23 06:15:33 · answer #1 · answered by 43 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Blair thinks he superior full stop. They are both liars and hypocrites. Bush has money and when he goes will be OK. Tony has a mortgage he cant pay and a wife who thinks she is the Queen. So he has to butter up and laugh at school room jokes from Bush. He hopes he will find him a little job as we will break out of the EU before Blair gets on the gravy train.
2006-07-23 10:16:01 · answer #2 · answered by deadly 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In what way is Blair superior to Bush? Clearly, not in the ways that matter to Blair. I think Blair's intelligence has been greatly exaggerated, and he does not seem to respect intelligence, anyway. He just seems to be a money and power grubber, and Bush has more of both of those thing than he has, so Bush is superior.
2006-07-23 06:45:01 · answer #3 · answered by hi_patia 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because we still owe the USA billions of dollars for the help they gave us during world war 2.Why do you think that we were the only country in Europe that the nazis never conquered?We won the Battle of Britain, but would not have been able to be self sufficient for long after that. It was because the USA supplied us with food,raw materials,armaments and fuel.We would never have been able to fight the Germans on our own without the United States.that's why we are the best friend that they have got.Wherever they go,we go.And that way we pay them back.
However,if the Germans had beaten Britain during the war,the United states would have had no platform from which to launch D Day,this country was like a huge aircraft and troop carrier to the US then.Hitler would have been very difficult to beat if it hadn't been for that fact.He could have handled the Russians, but not the USA,Russia and Britain.
2006-07-23 06:22:16 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Claim 1: Blair is superior to Bush.
Claim 2 (implied): The superior do not follow.
Claim 3: Blair follows Bush.
There's no point in asking "why?" given that you have a set of claims which aren't compatible. At best, you must reject one of these claims. It is up to you to decide which one to reject.
2006-07-23 06:16:59 · answer #5 · answered by Grammar=Fun 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Blair might have a superior intellect, but since he has turned himself into a complete poodle of the current US administration, he is obviously not making much use of it.
2006-07-23 06:16:04 · answer #6 · answered by Magic Gatherer 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Blair and Bush, they are different sides of the same coin and both twisters or should I say twisted with their own self righteousness and arrogance.
2006-07-23 08:09:09 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
blair got bush on a tight leash. if it wasnt for blair we'd be in the middle of world war three now
2006-07-23 06:43:10 · answer #8 · answered by busted 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
B-lair has lost his bottle!
We wish he would stick up 4 himself, being referred 2 by Mr Bush as " YO BLAIR OR MY BOY ", is Very Very UNCOOL!
Find UR backbone MR B-LAIR & help us out the hole the US appears 2 B putting us in!
2006-07-23 06:16:02 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You are correct. However, you forget that Bush had Blair neutered when he adopted him out of the kennel.
2006-07-23 06:16:44 · answer #10 · answered by Grendle 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋