The photo says it all:
http://yalibnan.com/site/archives/2006/07/the_child_lies.php
2006-07-23 06:03:00 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
No, I do NOT. Have you seen the United Nations pictures from Lebanon? Have you seen the dead children and babies that Operation Just Cause has produced? You sound like a rambling fool, and hate monger. There is no excuse to kill innocent children in a war, but the Israelis have the attitude that "Nits beget Lice", or, it's OK to kill Lebanese babies and children, so that they do not grow up to be adult Lebanese. What acts of terror has the children and babies committed to deserve to be shelled by the Israelis? Why do little Israeli children write messages on the artillery shells before they get fired into Lebanon? This is the same kind of crap the Nazis were doing in world war two. What crimes are the Lebanese children, and babies accused of? I have seen the pictures from the United Nations, and it makes me want to shell Israel. Godly people? I don't think so, more like hell spawned demons, and baby butchers, if you ask me. Think I'm joking? Go to www.fromisraeltolebanon.com, if your stomach can handle the truth. If not, then just keep spewing the republican party line that the little children are being killed to make the world a better place.
2006-07-23 06:56:58 · answer #1 · answered by Darqblade 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You keep posting this, but its not going to change the issue at hand.
The Lebanese government has failed these people, not the Israeli.
Warning was given to these villagers to leave, but it is not passed on to them from the officials.
Hezbollah has controlled this government, and subsequently these people for decades. Unlike a true government who's interest lies in the welfare of its peoples, Hezbollah has a single mission to wipe Israel off the map, and these poor people are only collateral damaged used to fuel the fire against Israel.
What government does remain in Lebanon does not want to cooperate with any country trying to diplomatically, or forcefully uproot Hezbollah.
These people have been failed. Fact still remains that Hezbollah, and other regimes like it must be destroyed.
2006-07-23 13:11:01 · answer #2 · answered by amosunknown 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hmmmm
No
The picture has been photo-shopped. Look at the details it is obviously a composite.
Then the whole 10 year old aspect takes away some of the contemporaneous punch of good shock reporting.
Try editing the article to make it look like it just happened. Maybe superimpose a Nazi and a Jew sticking bayonets into children. Then re-post your question.
If you get favorable results then link in a source for donations to injured children. You could make Million$.
2006-07-23 13:28:48 · answer #3 · answered by 43 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
israel never claimed to be accurate. And how do you know that child was killed by an Israeli bomb? Do you think hizbollah isnt shooting back or something?
But are they using it to good effect? Hell yes. They got clerics in saudi arabia, the bastion of Islam, to denounce Hezbollah. A muslim country denouncing a muslim terrorist organization? Mission accomplished.
War is hell and "collateral damage" is guaranteed in 100% of conflicts.
2006-07-23 13:06:11 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well if Lebanon didn't let the terrorist in their country to attack Israel then it would not have happen and it is called collateral damage and perfectly acceptable for a country to defend itself.
Show me any conflict that collateral damage didnt happen.
Why not show the Terrorist damage done to Isreal and their kids.
2006-07-23 13:09:27 · answer #5 · answered by ML 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i gues it really comes down to what you think "good effect" is. I would think good effect would be using them for a common cause. Although this still could possibly not too good.
2006-07-23 13:07:11 · answer #6 · answered by lumwoz 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
with all the high tech weapons just don't understand why civilians got killed more than the soldiers
2006-07-23 13:10:04 · answer #7 · answered by Wiseguy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
your definition of 'good effect' is killing hundreds of innocent people... I wouldnt call that a good effect
2006-07-23 13:10:17 · answer #8 · answered by madeline 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
good effect? definetly no, killing people isnt good
2006-07-23 13:06:22 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
absolutely...
2006-07-23 13:06:32 · answer #10 · answered by survivor 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋