It used to just be E=MC, but then it was discoverd otherwise. But what if mass does not increase as you approach C? What if neutrons do travel at maximum C? What if time is a constant? I wonder how the formulae would look then.
PS: i don't know what I'm talking about, but just pondering.
2006-07-23 05:56:07 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics ➔ Physics
Special Relativity Theory examines the behaviour of a quantum of light in the vacuum.
1) The First law of SRT - the speed of a quantum of light in vacuum has
a maximal magnitude (constant, absolute) of c=1.
2) SRT is not considered a gravitational field.
For this reason, Einstein created General Relativity Theory in 1915.
The field in which there is no gravitation is a vacuum.
3) This asserts that action in SRT occurs with particles in
negative four-dimensional (Minkowski) space. This space is absolute.
Mathematicians have constructed its model and speak
of this negative space as completely abstract.
Nobody sees that it has no connection to real existence.
This is similar to a sad joke.
For 100 years everyone has admired SRT.
Millions of articles, reviews and books have been written
and the United Nations has decided to establish 2005 as the centennial year of SRT.
Consider that all that is clear in this theory
is that negative four-dimensional space is abstract and has no real existence.
My God! There does not appear to be anyone to laugh at this joke!
Everyone searches for complex models of four-dimensional space, but truth lies in simplicity. All is very simple.
We meet the negative characteristic of space only in the vacuum, and in the vacuum,
space is merged with time (negative four-dimensional space).
According to the first law, the speed of light is absolute and movement occurs
in the absolute vacuum. So why does everyone speak and write that there is no
absolute movement; that only relative movement v =s/t is real?
Why does everyone say that there is no absolute reference system,
if the absolute speed can be only in absolute space?
Here we have one of the paradoxes in human intelligence.
2006-07-23 06:07:25 · answer #1 · answered by socratus 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Asper heisenbergs principle measurements can only be taken as averages. The same applies to velocity of light=its only an average measurement..
The measurent of velocity is only avereage;however the final velocity can be calculated as twice the average velocity.
So the final velocity of light relative to the earth would be twice the measured velocity.
Hence the Henri Point Carre equation of E=mc^2 is missing a term. Hence the equation is only one quarter accurate.Could Einstein have misunderstood that equation? that is the question or not the question.
I dont know what i am talking about either . who can understand quantum mechanisc?
2006-07-23 06:17:04 · answer #2 · answered by goring 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You forgot to carry the 1
2006-07-23 06:00:12 · answer #3 · answered by Bill 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
good, you're understanding the concept of "theory". e=mc² is part of the theory of relativity (and quantum physics theory if my memories of quantum physics are correct).
it is NOT "true". It is a representation of the reality. And we will keep that representation as long as it keeps being ACCURATE.
2006-07-23 06:01:16 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
you're right.....you don't know what you are talking about. E=mc doesn't even give anything close to proper units. it would never have been mentioned or written by any competent anybody.
2006-07-23 06:00:39 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Join the realm of string theorists.....
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/elegant/
2006-07-23 06:00:52 · answer #6 · answered by the beleiver 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You have a gr8 imagination!!!
2006-07-23 06:15:58 · answer #7 · answered by louisa 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
quantum physics change all that.
2006-07-23 06:00:06 · answer #8 · answered by shclapitz 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋