The Steelers definitely should have won. people complain about the refs, but if you look at the plays again, the right calls were made.
2006-07-23 06:41:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by packerswes4 5
·
3⤊
1⤋
Ok, it should have been the Seahawks! The better team did not win! There were a few bad calls and that is what did the Seahawks in! Steelers fans can say what they want to, but they know what happened and if it was reversed the Steelers fans would be saying the same thing.
2006-07-23 05:04:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by DanKohner 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Steelers should have won. There were some questionable calls but they went both ways. It was not the refs fault that the Seahawks mismanaged the clock at the end of each half, or that Stevend dropped several passes, or that they got burned by a trick play. They were outplayed and should have lost the game. All of their whining only took away from their achievements during the course of the season.
2006-07-23 06:13:47
·
answer #3
·
answered by bulladawudz 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, I'm a Redskin's fan, and the Seahawks beat us in the playoffs, so Naturally I would say Steelers. I Felt like us Redskins was Screwed out of that Playoff Game by the Refs. But you know how the Saying goes, "What goes around, comes back around". I Admit that Superbowl was not a fair game, but I feel like the Steelers Deserved that Win a lot more than the Hawks.
2006-07-23 05:32:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by bigvince85 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
everyone who says the refs won the super bowl for the steelers is an idiot... the refs tried to get peyton a way into the super bowl with the bs call about polamalu not intercepting and a bunch of other crap but the fact is that the team with more heart won that game and won the superbowl... if the seahawks had as much willpower as the steelers then they wouldnt have let the refs come between them and a championship...
2006-07-23 05:57:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by hispanicbro77 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Seahawks probably should have won the game given they had a better team and all that crap...but those refs really weren't making it easy on them. Yeah if you like the Steelers you're going to say it was all fair game....but if it was your team you'd be saying the same thing Seahawks fans are saying...I personally hate both teams but Seattle really got screwed in that game.
2006-07-23 05:17:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by Carolina Kitten 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, since the Steelers won that day, the Steelers deserved to win. The Seahawks didn't have it that day, the Steelers did. They had their chance to beat them, but they failed. End of discussion.
2006-07-23 19:39:35
·
answer #7
·
answered by sidnee_marie 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm going to agree with anyone that says the better team did not win. But, it's not because of the refs or any other person that was not playing the game. It's because the better team did not show up to play. The Seahawks should have one that game. They didn't play like they wanted to.
2006-07-23 08:16:19
·
answer #8
·
answered by Jake W 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Seahawks. They got cheated out of a super bowl. plus i hate the steelers.
2006-07-23 09:23:15
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
no longer 'u . s .' yet 'international places'. Allies - u.s., us of a, uk, France & (Nationalist) China - gained the war. for their labours they have been given the optimal place interior the newly created UN, as (irreplaceable) everlasting individuals of the protection Council to supervise the international Peace. besides the undeniable fact that it does no longer mean that each and every person different international places have been bystanders gazing a street-practice. on the Axis component have been Germany, Italy, Japan & some greater eu international places like Romania & have been given defeated. different than the Latin American international places, many greater different international places via distinctive function of being colonies of those eu Powers (uk, Denmark, France, The Netherlands, Belgium, Italy) have been in touch interior the war on the Allied component, via default. case in point the British have been straining to advance an Indian military of a few million battling adult adult males, on a similar time as their Dominions Australia, Canada, new Zealand & South Africa fought on equivalent footing. among the countries maximum adult adult males who fought & killed have been the Soviets (of u.s.) on Allied component, the Germans on the Axis component (adversaries) & Indians (India wasn't self sustaining then) on Allied component - in that order.
2016-12-10 12:47:47
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋