http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=545886459853896774&q=WTC....watch the video...and then decide!
2006-07-23 03:47:10 · 11 answers · asked by WORD UP G 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
yes there was explosives used in the 9-11 attacks. If you view loose change 911 it shows the building fall and these bombs going off 3 floors below the toppling part of the tower. Also explains the law and free falling mass. Then shows how many seconds it took for the towers to fall. If it wasn't blown up it would have been far longer than the law of free falling mass.
Watch the video titled loose change 911 2nd edition.
Also shows that the first cell station wasn't installed on American airlines til July 2004, when they claimed cellphones to work during the attacks. Even if you don't want to believe anything I am saying, look at sources that state the law on free falling mass, or the periodic table of elements, which states jet engines are made of a material that require a much higher temperature than jet fuel can supply to be destroyed. Then look up tech news outside of popular mechanics for when a cell station was installed on American airlines.
The truth is out there.....
Bush and his friends and family need to pay for killing all these people. Even the war is making Bush and Cheney money. Should we die so they can get rich, and avoid jail?
2006-07-23 04:06:02 · answer #1 · answered by jeff a 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
A few years before the WTC attack, I was watching a documentary on demolition experts blowing up old skyscrappers that were not needed anymore (very interesting :P).
Without even watching the mentioned video, when I was watching the WTC collapse, I had this weird feeling that there was something strange about this collapse, as if it was engineered like in the documentary I saw.
According to evidence, the buildings collapse as fast as free-fall speed, meaning if someone jumped out the window at the moment it was collapsing, they would land at the same time the building finished collapsing. Given the resistance of all the concrete and steel beams inside the building, there's no way this building could have collapsed on its own at that speed. All the jet fuel crap to lower the beam's resistance that I hear out there will only affect the few floors where the jetliner hit. It takes way more than half a second (or less) to make a steel beam lose it's power to hold.
Food for thought people. There's plenty of very fishy details about the 9/11 attack. I've never believed in conspiracy theory until this. A little bit of physics knowledge and some common sense, u will be able to find other oddities in the stories that passed on the news and by the government.
Now let me watch this little video
2006-07-23 04:27:58 · answer #2 · answered by rice kid 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Occam's Razor: When competing theories have equal predictive powers, select those that introduce the fewest assumptions and postulate the fewest hypothetical entities. (paraphrased)
What you see dripping from the side of the building is melted aluminum, IMHO. The aircraft struck the building from the other side and did not pass all the way through. Thus, a large portion of it is compressed against the near side (from the camera's perspective) of the building.
Structural aircraft aluminum melts around 1100 degrees F. The jet fuel fire was easily hot enough to do that. And, once the jet fuel set the contents of the building on fire, the temperature reached 1800 degrees in some places.
Osama Bin Laden and Al-Qaeda planned the attack. Get over it.
2006-07-23 04:08:27 · answer #3 · answered by Otis F 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No they were not, a large ( well two large planes) hit the towers.
It is very possible that the government had various things stored in the towers, things we will never know about in all sorts of labs and storagae areas.
But planes hit,
all other ideas are merley hatefull people who do not want to give respect to the people on the plane that died and all of our brothers and sisters in law enforcement and the fire department who died
2006-07-23 03:52:58 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Uhhh nope. They had tons of folks in the cleanup and bomb material sniffing dogs. No such thing.
I do think its weird to hear all this screaming but when they show the people they seem pretty calm and are just looking at it.
If you do believe it was bombeed they you either think the Masons or the Jews did it.
2006-07-23 03:54:28 · answer #5 · answered by Lupin IV 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
HELL NO, ALL THAT IS BULLSH**. The speed of the planes, the structure of the twin towers, and the melting of the metal by the intense heat all play a part in the destruction.
2006-07-23 03:54:08 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Awesome video. But it was the force of the crash. burning jet fuel, and weight of the upper section of the building on the warping/melting support beams which brought down the buildings.
2006-07-23 03:51:46 · answer #7 · answered by Gardenfoot 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Princess Dianna and Elvis did it!! They're both alive and well living in a underground bunker just outside of Vegas ROFL
2006-07-23 04:04:00 · answer #8 · answered by sealss3006 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
watch the movie"the twin towers: anatomy of the collapse" it will explain why the fell so quickly due to how they were built
2006-07-23 03:58:06 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No Just another example of people trying to create a conspiracy.
2006-07-23 03:52:26 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋