Let's analyze:
Hitler has more military experience(8 years of wars).
Osama on the other hand is a zealous Muslim and is capable of inspiring people to commit suicide rather then surrender.
This is tough.
Yet i would go with Hitler -- real experience beats out zeal any day.
2006-07-23 06:15:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by hq3 6
·
4⤊
2⤋
Ok first of all, Hitler was not a military genius as some of you are saying. Why don't you do some research instead of recycling people's ideas?
Anyways, Hitler would be better in this situation because he was more organized and had more experience.
2006-07-23 18:16:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by anonymous 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Since Hitler wussed out and killed himself, I think Osama is more appropriate.
Find him a cave in Lebanon and let's get it on...
2006-07-23 10:05:08
·
answer #3
·
answered by R J 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hitler was a military genius and charasmatic leader. Osama just appears to be a complete nutjob.
2006-07-23 10:05:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by ceprn 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would say Osama because Hitler is already six feet under.
2006-07-23 10:49:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Cave hunting Lebanon anyone?
I wonder though who would rally behind either?
2006-07-23 11:16:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by betterdeadthansorry 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
osama just blows stuff up hitler was smarter
2006-07-23 10:02:53
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am the best...and i will never do a stupid things like attacks lebanon. and God will never allow.
2006-07-23 10:32:03
·
answer #8
·
answered by I am Back 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Go with Hitler. You won't regret it.
2006-07-23 10:06:02
·
answer #9
·
answered by ElOsoBravo 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Attacks are appropriate?
2006-07-23 10:20:33
·
answer #10
·
answered by The Witten 4
·
0⤊
0⤋