2006-07-23 01:24:00 · 10 answers · asked by mouthbreather77 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
FDR pursued disarmament and neutrality in the 30s. There was not a single U.S. troop marching with France and Britain in May 1940.
2006-07-24 00:16:28 · update #1
Your'e kidding right. Your are trying to compare one of the five greatest presidents- FDR- with one of the five worst - GWB. You really need to read more. Would you want GWB running WWII?
2006-07-23 03:09:07 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think he is. He is not the sharpest knife in the box and he runs the goverment in the worst way possible. He has already invaded a country for no reason, he listend to a girl reading a story book for 7 mins before he reacted to 9/11, he let the bin laden's go after 9/11.. He is nobodys precident at least FDR cared for some people.
2006-07-23 08:47:54 · answer #2 · answered by Zac 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
First of all I voted for Bush. Secondly - how on earth can you imply that FDR wasn't a good president???
He was the ONLY president to be elected president for 4 terms and who do you think created the new deal, social security, FDIC, Umemployment benefits, Revenue Act of 1932, Fair Labor Standards Act, minimum wage, and many other programs that I cant think of at the moment because I am tired. - Youre an idiot
2006-07-23 23:22:29 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He's far worse than FDR since FDR falls easily into the top ten greatest presidents of all time while Georgie boy is, well, he's a putz.
2006-07-24 20:05:00 · answer #4 · answered by Who cares 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I find your question to be utterly incomprehensible.
You're attempting to make a comparison between George Bush and Franklin Roosevelt?? That's like comparing Cookie Monster to T. Rex. Golly gee whiz, let's see...
well, FDR was intelligent, compassionate, witty, cultured, confident, forward-looking...and Dubya is stupid, callous, greedy, incompetent...
Oh yeah, other than those few qualities, they could've been separated at birth.
Duhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh...
2006-07-23 09:09:58 · answer #5 · answered by St. Hell 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
FDR was one of, if not the greatest presidents of all time. I can't even remotly comprehend why you say he was a bad president. Can you give any reasons to support you claim, or can we say the you slept through history class?
2006-07-24 02:43:07 · answer #6 · answered by Shane S 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, he could be one of the worst presidents ever. FDR was one of the greatest presidents in history.
2006-07-23 16:03:16 · answer #7 · answered by MTSU history student 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Probably just about as bad, but for different reasons. Bush still has a couple more years to get his act together, or to screw things up even more.... we'll see.
2006-07-23 08:33:33 · answer #8 · answered by Spel Chekker 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's like saying "Do you think that Malik Rose is even worse than Michael Jordan?" What?
2006-07-23 12:00:34 · answer #9 · answered by Bee 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As long as he doesn't get worse than Carter.
2006-07-23 08:29:44 · answer #10 · answered by kayef57 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋