george bush said last week that he willput the world into world war 3 do you think that would happen?
2006-07-22 22:06:53 · 21 answers · asked by DIFFERENT 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
You are a slanderer a liar and a muckraker.
2006-07-22 22:24:13 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I think we're having a sub-version right now. Like WW 2.210. US is just trying to get out of the dirt it has plunged into (Iraq, Afghanistan) right now by getting European and Nato allies into nonsense virtual crusades and religious conflicts. The sectarian violence in Iraq is a co-product of US-Britain that results in killing of innocent people. Islam does not really approve of killing a brother . Except for the Al-Quaeda version which is again a result of CIA&MI6 insanity.
G.W.Bush is nobody in fact but the puppet of some generals. He is probably used to sitting on their laps frequently. It will be a surprise if he finishes his term alive.
The jews in Israel are actually victims too if you look at their situation. They've been deceived by merchants of death who promised them a land which is now bloody, cursed and doomed to die.
These people are not so stupid to wait for the savior. That's why exodus has already begun in flocks. They're just bringing in Ethopians to cover it up.
If individuals push it hard enough. All governments will eventually have to obey a new version of NPT and ban all kinds of Nuclear, Biological, and Chemical weapons and our children won't have to worry about world wars.
2006-07-22 22:35:29 · answer #2 · answered by Pishisauraus 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
he's certainly dumb enough to, and the american people let him. When I lived in the USA I was amazed at how hard it was to find news of what was really going on in the world. You may think you have free press in the states but it's certainly very one sided. The amercian people are being manipulated just like Bush is being manipulated.
2006-07-22 22:26:24 · answer #3 · answered by Bryn H 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
World War can not be possible if we all think calmly and never fight with each other.Now is the time to be alert so that he will not be successful in making a war after World war 2.No--never it will happen.Just careful.
2006-07-22 22:14:22 · answer #4 · answered by Mehbooba 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
he did not know that he is not the president till he got there the Israeli lobby is the USA president he was fooled. War in Iraq Israeli war the USA Veto at UN is Israeli veto ."Every time we do something you tell me America will do this and will do that . . . I want to tell you something very clear: Don't worry about American pressure on Israel. We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it." -- Ariel Sharon to Shimon Peres, October 3rd, 2001, as reported on Kol Yisrael
www.nowarforisrael.com/
2006-07-22 22:41:08 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
it's not that way when he entered iraq us army killed many pepole so thier are too many young men and wemenwant to have their revenge so you will see some think like 11septemper
this time but 3rd war like the other two i don't think so you must remmember that the nuclear weapon ae no longer in the hand of the us only it's now on dangerus hands
2006-07-22 22:37:30 · answer #6 · answered by AHMED EMAD 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope. While it hasn't been recognized yet, WW 3 took place from 1945 until the wall fell in Berlin. We won (thanks to RWR).
WW 4 started on 9/11/01. We're gonna win that too, but it will take some time.
2006-07-22 22:16:29 · answer #7 · answered by SPLATT 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
American politics are pushed with the aid of capability and greed. this is the "Capitalist" mentality spurred on with the aid of a worldwide economic gadget. Polticians do no longer run this u . s . - "vast company" and "particular interest communities" run this u . s . - Bush isn't something extra suitable than a puppet. what's happening in Iraq and Afghanistan have religeous implications. whilst that occurs, this is a no-win undertaking for each individual. this finished "God informed me to bypass to war" is bullshit! Whomever's mouth it comes out of. And maximum individuals won't be in a position of strike, protest, etc. with the aid of fact maximum individuals are too occupied in basic terms attempting to enhance a relatives and make ends meet. The economic gadget is undesirable, there are few nicely-paying jobs, and persons in basic terms won't be in a position of arise with the funds for to do something that ought to jeopardize the roles they have. There are alot of folk in this u . s . who do unlike what's happening. yet there is not any longer a hell of alot we are in a position to do approximately it. and that i does no longer precisely call Iraq and Afghanistan "innocuous".
2016-10-08 05:41:26 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He is a war lover, I think he has a weapen factory, war will serve him well. But he will not find who will follow him, unless he pays for their participation
2006-07-22 22:37:01 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
doubtful...to have a world war, there must be somewhat balanced forces engaged in it. And momentarily, the forces are unballanced for the U.S.
2006-07-22 22:11:10 · answer #10 · answered by ioa_3000 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Cold War was WWIII, can he take us back in time?
2006-07-22 22:12:16 · answer #11 · answered by mikeythechimpwillhewin 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋