A team equipped with a big tube will syphon Loch ness at 15.00 today. The water will be stored in a large tank until the loch floor is searched. The RSPCA say they will monitor this project over the coming weeks. Live coverage will be on channel 4 throught the day.
2006-07-22 20:56:27 · 35 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Logically their really is no way that a single animal, mammal and or insect of an abnormal size still be in existence today. If it where true it would have been taken alot more seriously and would actually become something that would go down into the worlds history books and be marveled at. This is not the case. Logically an animal of that caliber, a beast of that magnitude and stature couldn't possibly still be alive. Researchers and scientist around the glob have proven that it was very possible for the earth at one time to have extrodinary things roam the plains of the earth, e.i., Giant bettles, millipeads, spiders the size of a regular house dog, etc., etc. This was possible because these animals and insects were in an oxygen rich environment. This atmosghere was rich in oxygen, in other words the oxygen was plentyfull. Unlike today where the oxygen level isn't even half of what it was in the prehistoric ages. This will explain why ants are so small, why the butterfly doesn't have bigger wings, why there are no longer birds that have the wing span nor the overall size of the teradacto. Therefore, an animal that size in this world would not be able to survive because of the large decress in oxygen. The food it would probably eat would'nt be as plentyfull so their for it would most likely starve to death. And lastly, among all of the other variables the manmouth mammal would have to beable to completly, succesfully evade and fool its worst and most deadly enemy. Humans. The way we polute, fish in mass quantitites the poor animal just wouldn't beable sustain its self.
Sadly, this is the truth and these marvolous creaters will never agan be on earth so long that humans continue to play the role as the dominent species. We dominate all parts of the world therefore, naturally, everything else kind of takes a back seat on the importance chart. More than likely they will probably find some interesting things but an actient dinasaur, regretably, won't be one of them.
2006-07-22 21:41:14 · answer #1 · answered by nostridomius 2 · 17⤊ 13⤋
They should be so lucky! I hear that Loch Ness is bottomless.
But if they did drain it they would not find anything, because it's so deep that nothing can live there.
As for Nessi that is just wishful thinking, But it does draw a lot of Daft Brits to spend money for souvenirs!
2006-07-23 00:27:09 · answer #2 · answered by paullizuk 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I give you 10 points for imagination. HAHAHA drain the loch ROFL
2006-07-22 21:02:19 · answer #3 · answered by the prof 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
A crate of Barr's Irn Bru - Scotland's national drink.
2006-07-22 21:24:03 · answer #4 · answered by Mac 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Do you know how big Loch Ness is? There isn't a storage tank big enough for all that water in the world.
2006-07-22 22:29:45 · answer #5 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Brill
2006-07-22 21:04:31 · answer #6 · answered by clare s 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. When I was little,I believe only lots of sock lives under my bed followed by lots of toy that I didn't put back into the box so I see no monster.
2016-03-16 03:51:08 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
This sounds like one ridiculous hoax. The Loch is like 1900 ft deep (on average), it contains millions of gallons of water. Even if there WERE a tank big enough to hold all that water, pumping it out of the loch would take weeks. Also, I believe the Loch is fed by the ocean. Do they plan on on draining the entire Atlantic?
This endeavor reminds me of a proposed Space Launch to the Sun. Reporters were aghast. "The Sun has a surface temperature in the millions of degrees! You'll burn up if you try to land there!"
The flight leader nods condescendingly. "That's not a factor. We plan on landing at NIGHT."
2006-07-23 03:19:27 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
they will find that they are still trying to drain the loch,for the next 500 years.nice try
2006-07-22 21:04:12 · answer #9 · answered by robbie 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
very funny do you know how much water is in loch ness i don't think anyone could ever build a tank big enough it would years and years to build wake up and don't believe everything you read
2006-07-22 21:29:59 · answer #10 · answered by The Wanderer 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Lord Lucan & Shergar
2006-07-22 21:24:41 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋