2006-07-22 20:14:47 · 15 answers · asked by Emily B 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
HAHAHA Rock on, Girl!!!!
We should send a request for update in to Websters! hahahaha
2006-07-22 20:24:13 · answer #1 · answered by Stormy 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Well once you have all the facts then you can't really be ignorant. Ignorant just means a lack of knowledge.
Having all the information and then making a poor decision would display a lack of intelligence, which would typically be expressed by labeling someone an idiot.
People who are ignorant by choice, by choosing not to look at the information from both sides, I would call absolutists. And you can find them on both ends of the political spectrum.
2006-07-22 20:34:53 · answer #2 · answered by Tomis 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Webster's doesn't like redundancy. That's the definition already given under 'Emily B', it doesn't like to repeat itself.
2006-07-22 20:18:06 · answer #3 · answered by XYZ 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
opposite to regularly happening perception this utilization isn't lazy or indecent neither is it as present day as lots of you look to imagine. a minimum of as a techniques lower back because the time of the american Revolution pls or plz replaced into used rather of please in correspondence , lower back after the creation of the telegraph, and maximum lately with the creation of textual content messaging, and excited by an similar reason, value. in the course of the early days of our us of a both paper and ink were extreme priced, so there have been effortless techniques of abbreviation to cram as a lot techniques right into a letter as plausible pls (or plz) replaced into one party of this. even as sending telegrams you've been charged by skill of the interest (as in typing each 5 characters not actual words) so once lower back pls replaced into used (between many different shortcuts u for you etc) to make the sending of a message as decrease priced as plausible. As for textual content messaging, even as first presented, you need to remember, we were charged per message we despatched, so slicing letters out of messages meant a unmarried textual content may be despatched rather of two. It grew to grow to be a habit that carried over onto the internet, even inspite of the actuality that the favor for the abbreviation no lengthy exists,,,,to be honest inspite of the actuality that i'm truly particular you style ok or ok rather of Orl Korrekt it really is the extensively effortless unique word the abbreviation got here from, so are you able to somewhat solid stones?
2016-12-10 14:01:33 · answer #4 · answered by mijarez 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What is the point in asking questions to try to get a rise out of people...are you really that bored? (just for the record, I am really bored, which is why I am answering this question).
2006-07-22 20:47:49 · answer #5 · answered by jillkmilk 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
im sure theyd agree to that so long as websters also linked "conservative" with "naive"
2006-07-22 20:19:05 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It could be the definition right after "Emily B."
2006-07-22 20:18:26 · answer #7 · answered by m137pay 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ha ha ha...
I don't think the liberals will agree with you though... I can't wait to see the "Hate Answers"
2006-07-22 20:18:03 · answer #8 · answered by John H 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No.That definition was allready taked for the term'Republican'.
2006-07-22 20:18:48 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ah a baited question, I think perhaps you mean conservative. Who needs em? conservative also means anus giganticus
2006-07-22 20:20:48 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋