English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I want to view the rings of saturn and all that other stuff. I already have a pair of 15x70 and I can't seem to see anything! I keep hearing that 7x50's are the best....

2006-07-22 16:43:03 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics Astronomy & Space

4 answers

Those 15x70s should be good. Do you have a mount for them? That will stabilize the image and make things easier to see. A 15 magnification is usually too much for hand-held. The 7x50 will have less magnification. That means that saturn will be a bit harder to see. Don't expect much more than an elongated spot. With a 15x and a mount, you will be able to just make out that there are rings.

2006-07-22 16:53:32 · answer #1 · answered by mathematician 7 · 2 0

7x50's are excellent but they are less powerful than 15x70's and cannot see the rings on Saturn. They are good for starfield gazing, star clusters, and figuring out what that flashing thing is.

You will be able to see the rings on Saturn with a 4.5" Newtonian telescope and a 25mm eyepeice (preferably with a 2x barlow).

A used one will run you $150 for something like a Celestron c4.5" on an equatorial mount.

You may be able to get a decent look with some type of refractor. I know some very nice pictures of Saturn have been taken with 80mm refractors (apochromatic) but the camera sees more than the eye and photos can be enlarged so I'm not sure how easily it can be seen live viewing it in one of those.

2006-07-22 18:43:52 · answer #2 · answered by minuteblue 6 · 1 0

7X50 are best for seeing dim but large objects like nebulae and galaxies. For planets, which are bright but small, you need a telescope. 7x or even 15x is not enough magnification to see Saturn's rings, although Jupiter's 4 largest Moons are easily visible in any binoculars. For Saturn's rings you will need at least 30x just to barely see them. For good views of Saturn's rings you will need 100x or higher magnification.

2006-07-22 16:52:40 · answer #3 · answered by campbelp2002 7 · 0 0

10x50's could nicely be hand-held despite if it unquestionably helps to props them up against a wall or different handy merchandise. 7x50's are somewhat extra effectual for hand-held use yet of direction are much less efficient. the image stabilised binoculars attainable come close to to being a acceptable for the two makes use of. They artwork o.k.. notwithstanding maximum of them are on the small part in terms of aperture the IS gadget extra suitable than compensates. I definitely have a pair of Canon 12x36s and that i'll actuality by no ability area with them. they're additionally extremely small and mild-weight whilst in comparison with 50mm binos. unfortunately, they do no longer seem to be much less high priced.

2016-10-08 05:31:26 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers