ok a while back, not to far back Stephen Hawkings made to comment about for humans to survive we need to go into space....I love the idea as a fan of scifi, but I also a philosophier, hippie type at heart, and of course I deal i a realm of reality. Anyway moving along...If human kind cant survive on earth, then where dumb as H. E. double hokey sticks. Let me explain the earth is a big place, even if its smaller then other planets, and it recycles everything, an preserves and protects everything, as long as its not being "more out then in" we will be fine on earth, as far as resourse are concerned, anything else the earth will work out. But in space we will probably be in bio-domes or what have u, with very limited resourses(including air), and whatever we do to make it work as earth did, will not work, because of the population growth that may occuring in space, there will be "more out then in". So to survive in space we will have to have a set amount of resourse and capacity to
2006-07-22
16:15:13
·
4 answers
·
asked by
Derrick
3
in
Arts & Humanities
➔ Philosophy
provide for them, which we can better supply and provide on earth, in the long run, but we just have let nature do its work, any way do I make since? should we give up space and say adios to nasa, and fix the problem we caused on earth? and is this a propeling argument at all?
2006-07-22
16:17:37 ·
update #1
also do u understand the "more out then in" concept
2006-07-22
16:19:18 ·
update #2