English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Are people dying over there because it is the President's fault?

2006-07-22 15:46:16 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

12 answers

No there has always been conflict and people dying over there. This started way before Bush even considered running for president.

2006-07-22 15:50:20 · answer #1 · answered by Kim V 2 · 0 1

I don't think it's good reasoning to blame every global problem on one man no matter what his place in global politics.

There is a history between Lebanon and Israel of mistrust and suspicion and that has led to this entire nasty little affair. The thing just erupted overnight over some small affair. Cut Bush some slack. After all, we did put him in office.

2006-07-22 16:11:04 · answer #2 · answered by normal person 2 · 0 0

i imagine that the perfect answer to this question got here instantly from what bill Clinton suggested for the period of his first marketing campaign. "What ever one President does isn't glaring until eventually 6 to eight years after he's elected" declaring that, each and every President suffers or reward from what the previous administration has performed, so all those that are bashing Bush for 9/11 ought to heed properly the words of their HERO and also you'll't fairly choose Bush's complete impact until eventually the subsequent President is in workplace. If issues are large with the subsequent President, Bush changed into sturdy, if issues Suck then so did Bush. those that are complaining about the fee of gas are unaware that Al Gore offered off a huge component to our petroleum reserves to Occidental Petroleum, less than marketplace fee, no longer to assert that some thing changed into fishy (LOL) yet Al Gore Sr. worked for Occidental, rattling I keep forgetting this war is about OIL What protection rigidity, Clinton destroyed the protection rigidity, what percentage bases were closed less than the Clinton administration. how lots of the terrorists that attacked US pastimes (united statesCole, embassies assaults on golf equipment the position Marines were established to be) that bill Clinton PROMISED might want to be hunted down and punished were ever hunted down or punished. ZIP it truly is what percentage No liberal needs to hearken to that in 1995 the CIA got here upon information that terrorists had deliberate to apply plane to ruin the CIA construction, and in 1996 the CIA got here upon information that the terrorists had deliberate to ruin skyscrapers in lengthy island, all they listen is Bush gained intelligence comments 2 weeks earlier they performed their plan and receives the blame for no longer doing some thing. Bush receives 2 weeks, bill receives 4 years and does no longer some thing.

2016-11-25 02:40:43 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

This stuff has been going on before Mr. Bush was president and will probably continue long after he leaves office. The president isn't responsible for a fraction of what gets blamed on him. People's inability to get along and greed has a lot ot answer for.

2006-07-22 15:51:52 · answer #4 · answered by Walter G 1 · 0 0

No one knows the entire situation at present. Does the U.S. have some sort of role in this? Who knows? Was this Israel acting on its own with no collaboration from another country? Maybe? Did Israel get tired or fighting Palestinians and need a change of scenery? Did Ulhmert get a bad falafel and want to bomb to see if they would work? I would neither be surprised or shocked if this was an American idea, but I wouldn’t be surprised or shocked if it wasn’t. This is way to early to say what is going on until decades after this is over.

2006-07-22 16:16:55 · answer #5 · answered by wtc69789 2 · 0 0

OH sure. Bush is responsible for a lot of things.all bad nothing good. Fact is he's the worst. I'm looking forward to Hillary or Kerry OR a HILLARY/KERRY ticket. Oh yeah all those women in Iraq not gettin' beatin and those children were saved from sarin gas I'm sure they hate him too. Only a person who has underlying thoughts about being a pedophile would falsely accuse another of being one.

2006-07-22 15:59:47 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes

Think about it. If Bush had not decided to overthrow Iraq because he thought they were a threat... to be done with, I highly doubt Israel would be getting our ok.

The way Bush has done things have put us in a position where we can't say a darn word about what they are doing to deal with what they feel is a threat.

Also think about what Israel is thinking.. they know what I just stated and they are probably thinking that there is no way we can refuse to help them. Afterall, we did slander all countries, such as France, who refused to back us.

See?

2006-07-22 15:51:34 · answer #7 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 0 0

only stupid people like your miserable self would think of such a thing to say. how often where you raped by the gorillas in the zoo when you were young? or dropped on your head
you must be young so young that you know nothing about the real world grow up and get a real education not the doctored indoctrinations of left wing rhetoric get a real education

2006-07-22 15:51:52 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Of course it is ...now take a couple more zanny bars and go back to your playstation

FRANCE is a laughing stock on the world stage...the mighty U.S. of A. has pulled their a** out of the fire ...how many times now?..Everyone has lost count...France, gimme a break !

2006-07-22 15:54:38 · answer #9 · answered by rochelle_hall2000 3 · 0 0

OK...long story...I'll try...here goes...long story short...Bush likes watching lesbians, which sounds almost like lebonese, so...therefore...It HAS to be Bush's fault

2006-07-22 16:14:58 · answer #10 · answered by Slap Happy 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers