2006-07-22 14:44:53 · 52 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
No, I want the boys to come home. I am not a liberal, probably more conservative than I truly believe I am, but I think it's time for change. Just like it was after Clinton, just like after the Reagan/Bush years. I guess there's a reason for term limits ... we need a change.
2006-07-22 14:48:51 · answer #1 · answered by ? 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
I'd rather vote for Michael Jackson than George Bush.
2006-07-22 14:46:57 · answer #2 · answered by RamontheGreat 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Depends if there is a better candidate. The last election I chose Bush not necessarily because I thought he was great, but I'd rather see him run the country than that rat Kerry.
2006-07-22 14:48:11 · answer #3 · answered by wendygurl87 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush is a snake, just like the serpent who offered eve the apple. I laugh at all those fools who ever voted for him and the ignorant who still would choose to. Ha!
2006-07-22 14:58:31 · answer #4 · answered by doldemite 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
for the reason that this question is conditional and speculative, enable me to reply to interior accurate the following way. If he ought to run again, it may continuously count number antagonistic to whom he changed into operating. If it were once again Al Gore or John Kerry, easily and in a heartbeat. even as and if the democrats can placed a doable, electable candidate to the most advantageous area, i'd evaluate than man or woman.
2016-10-15 02:26:29 · answer #5 · answered by valderrama 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If he ran against the horrible candidates the Democrats keep putting up (Kerry, Gore) absolutely. Hopefully the nation will have a good choice in 2008.
2006-07-22 14:47:15 · answer #6 · answered by jh 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Never voted for him, never wanted to. If an emu ran against Bush, I'd be happy to trim the emu's feathers myself as his or her presidential emu groomer.
2006-07-22 14:48:49 · answer #7 · answered by Mandi 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!! He needs to understand what he is doing. He says that he is helping those people in Iraq but obviously NOT. Besides, the first thing he asked the new government was "can we have oil?"
He is so NOT really trying to help them, even if he was, was bombing them for "peace" really worth all those people dying and having their houses and reasorces distroyed?
2006-07-22 14:51:06 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who is running against him? Honestly people, I would vote for him before I voted for Satan.
2006-07-22 14:48:05 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope
2006-07-22 14:46:53 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋