A female dominated society and a male dominated society control roughly half the planet in, lets say, a hundred years time. What would these two superpowers be like and if they went to war who would win?
2006-07-22 13:48:02 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
Its just a fun question-if you think its stupid-dont answer, i dont answer stupid questions. Thanks.
2006-07-23 00:33:00 · update #1
Women would be the first to declare war when the president of Manland failed to notice the new hairdo of the president of Womanland.
Men would win the war when women discovered that war can be icky and gross. Besides, they could break a nail.
2006-07-22 13:52:26 · answer #1 · answered by Sebring Sage 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Whomever won, it would surely be a Pyrrhic victor as one would surely
cease to exist without the other.
Remember we are talking about mostly the same set of genes with only
1 different gene per a generation. That is, you are the product of your
mother's genes AND you father's genes. The evolution ... the co-evolution
for both is required for each generation.
Perhaps you are thinking of one side completely dominating the other?
One gender becoming slaves to the other?
The very idea implies physical force, which for better or worse is usually
the tool of the larger of the two (men).
Something less drastic wouldn't really fall into the realm of a war, would it?
I do think, however, that people will be pitting the two sexes against
each other for the rest of time. Neither side can wholly win without the
species changing considerably.
2006-07-22 13:57:38 · answer #2 · answered by Elana 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hi Max Headroom here,
God may have made man in his own image, but woman he definitely made from a do-it-yourself kit. All those valves, buttons, nozzles, all that just for producing children, and half the time they don't work. Which is why he probably created gynecologists very shortly afterwards. There must be an easier way. He got it right with birds. They just lay eggs. And they're happy. They sing all day. There's just too many things that can go wrong with women. And that's the point. Woman was an accident. He was actually trying to design a car. Which is why his German one turned out to be fast and efficient, his Japanese one small and neat, and his American one big, noisy, and more temperamental than all the others. Anyway, must go, my date's arrived
2006-07-23 07:43:57 · answer #3 · answered by Max Headroom 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The full scale war already happens. Its called domestic violence. Usually the man "wins" because of physical strength, but in some circumstances the female is the aggressor and the male doesn't like to beat up girls. I am a veteran of that war. I lost because I was brought up to be respectful to females and not hit them. The woman on the other hand, almost killed me and I still bear the scars.Then the family courts helped me to lose the peace. Under fundamentalist law in all judaeic religions (Jew, Muslim, Christian) the man always "wins". There are no winners in war. Grow up. Its all about how we are the same, not about how we are different.
2006-07-22 13:59:48 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Check the history of the Pellopinnesian Wars. Women "hands" down.
2006-07-22 13:52:50 · answer #5 · answered by Teacher 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Gosh that's horrible. Besides it would be a pointless vistory actually since we really need each other to survive and maintain the continuity of our species, unless of course, another way has been found.
But as a guy, i've learnt not to underestimate a woman. She's every bit as capable as a guy can be.
2006-07-22 17:17:30 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
in the course of the chilly warfare era, China replaced into dealing with a cutural revolution lower than Mao Tse tung. Everone had his little red e book "The recommendations of Mao" even if it replaced into restricted to China purely. China did not oppose the allies in WW2, because Japan had siezed some chinese language territories, and in 1935 the eastern occupied Nanking which replaced into an extremely Bloodthirsty occupation. It replaced into properly-called "The rape of Nanking". the eastern were beheading people interior the streets, and they tried to kill each chinaman/ female and newborn, to make it a organic eastern state. They were delighted in seeing the folk beating the eastern all the some time previous to Tokyo.
2016-12-10 13:48:00 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Females wouldn't use war as a solution to a problem. A solution to a problem that could result in getting your own children killed in the crossfire is not a solution at all.
2006-07-23 04:40:15 · answer #8 · answered by American Spirit 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think women have a lot more power than we're credited for. All we have to do is flash a bit of cleavage, show a bit of leg, and speak to a man in an alluring manner, and he's putty in our hands. Men are always trying to please their wives, mothers, girl friends and mothers in law. He can't handle the nagging and b*tching when he does something to piss us off.
In 100 years, all we women have to do is date or marry these men and we have complete control, and getting them to do just that is a piece of cake...lol...look at Eve, she convinced Adam to taste the apple.
2006-07-23 14:12:43 · answer #9 · answered by Optimistic 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
What about gay people? Not that there is anything wrong with it. I kind of like being dominated by women. LOL?
2006-07-22 13:56:39 · answer #10 · answered by robert f 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋