English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

he sucks as president just like his father which i did not vote for either

2006-07-22 13:14:28 · 19 answers · asked by ken o 2 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

19 answers

Absolutely. Why?:

1) Seizing power to wage wars of aggression in defiance of the U.S. Constitution, the U.N. Charter and the rule of law; carrying out a massive assault on and occupation of Iraq, a country that was not threatening the United States, resulting in the death and maiming of over one hundred thousand Iraqis, and thousands of U.S. G.I.s.

2) Lying to the people of the U.S., to Congress, and to the U.N., providing false and deceptive rationales for war.

3) Authorizing, ordering and condoning direct attacks on civilians, civilian facilities and locations where civilian casualties were unavoidable.

4) Instituting a secret and illegal wiretapping and spying operation against the people of the United States through the National Security Agency.

5) Threatening the independence and sovereignty of Iraq by belligerently changing its government by force and assaulting Iraq in a war of aggression.

6) Authorizing, ordering and condoning assassinations, summary executions, kidnappings, secret and other illegal detentions of individuals, torture and physical and psychological coercion of prisoners to obtain false statements concerning acts and intentions of governments and individuals and violating within the United States, and by authorizing U.S. forces and agents elsewhere, the rights of individuals under the First, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth and Eighth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

7) Making, ordering and condoning false statements and propaganda about the conduct of foreign governments and individuals and acts by U.S. government personnel; manipulating the media and foreign governments with false information; concealing information vital to public discussion and informed judgment concerning acts, intentions and possession, or efforts to obtain weapons of mass destruction in order to falsely create a climate of fear and destroy opposition to U.S. wars of aggression and first strike attacks.

8) Violations and subversions of the Charter of the United Nations and international law, both a part of the "Supreme Law of the land" under Article VI, paragraph 2, of the Constitution, in an attempt to commit with impunity crimes against peace and humanity and war crimes in wars and threats of aggression against Afghanistan, Iraq and others and usurping powers of the United Nations and the peoples of its nations by bribery, coercion and other corrupt acts and by rejecting treaties, committing treaty violations, and frustrating compliance with treaties in order to destroy any means by which international law and institutions can prevent, affect, or adjudicate the exercise of U.S. military and economic power against the international community.

9) Acting to strip United States citizens of their constitutional and human rights, ordering indefinite detention of citizens, without access to counsel, without charge, and without opportunity to appear before a civil judicial officer to challenge the detention, based solely on the discretionary designation by the Executive of a citizen as an "enemy combatant."

10) Ordering indefinite detention of non-citizens in the United States and elsewhere, and without charge, at the discretionary designation of the Attorney General or the Secretary of Defense.

11) Ordering and authorizing the Attorney General to override judicial orders of release of detainees under INS jurisdiction, even where the judicial officer after full hearing determines a detainee is wrongfully held by the government.

12) Authorizing secret military tribunals and summary execution of persons who are not citizens who are designated solely at the discretion of the Executive who acts as indicting official, prosecutor and as the only avenue of appellate relief.

13) Refusing to provide public disclosure of the identities and locations of persons who have been arrested, detained and imprisoned by the U.S. government in the United States, including in response to Congressional inquiry.

14) Use of secret arrests of persons within the United States and elsewhere and denial of the right to public trials.

15) Authorizing the monitoring of confidential attorney-client privileged communications by the government, even in the absence of a court order and even where an incarcerated person has not been charged with a crime.

16) Ordering and authorizing the seizure of assets of persons in the United States, prior to hearing or trial, for lawful or innocent association with any entity that at the discretionary designation of the Executive has been deemed "terrorist."

17) Engaging in criminal neglect in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, depriving thousands of people in Louisiana, Mississippi and other Gulf States of urgently needed support, causing mass suffering and unnecessary loss of life.

18) Institutionalization of racial and religious profiling and authorization of domestic spying by federal law enforcement on persons based on their engagement in noncriminal religious and political activity.

19) Refusal to provide information and records necessary and appropriate for the constitutional right of legislative oversight of executive functions.

20) Rejecting treaties protective of peace and human rights and abrogation of the obligations of the United States under, and withdrawal from, international treaties and obligations without consent of the legislative branch, and including termination of the ABM treaty between the United States and Russia, and rescission of the authorizing signature from the Treaty of Rome which served as the basis for the International Criminal Court.
Source(s):
www.votetoimpeach.org

2006-07-22 13:35:16 · answer #1 · answered by vacant 3 · 1 0

I think the only thing that prevents him being impeached is the thought of having Cheney as President ... now that would scare the **** outta me ... Bush is bad enough, but Cheney .... :(

2006-07-22 14:39:32 · answer #2 · answered by Sashie 6 · 0 0

How many people think you smoked enough joints to not realize Bush is President till Jan 20th, 2009

Get over it and if ya can't then please go move to a Country where only one Man gets to run for President and you either vote for him or else ya die or go to Prison.

2006-07-22 13:18:58 · answer #3 · answered by MrCool1978 6 · 0 0

he's a liar. and a murderer. and a draft dodger. and a spoiled, frat boy failure who's done more to erode America's strategic and moral strength than any president of the last 150 years. impeach him? yeah, to protect ourselves at this point!

2006-07-22 14:34:02 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I agree he stinks as a president, but in order to be impeached he needs to break a law. He's stupid, but not that stupid.

2006-07-22 13:17:34 · answer #5 · answered by basketcase88 7 · 0 0

Bush is guilty of treachery, he deliberately lied about the war in Iraq

2006-07-22 13:22:34 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

"I, Richard Bruce Cheney, do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

Like the sound of that, do you?

2006-07-22 13:20:33 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

What impeachable offense has he done?

It is not illegal for a person to be liked or disliked.

2006-07-22 13:18:09 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I wouldn't. I mean, he's only human. And it's not like people would be happy if it were someone else making different mistakes. No one human will ever be right in everyone's eyes.

2006-07-22 13:18:10 · answer #9 · answered by Alecto 5 · 0 0

I feel it's long overdue, The man has violated the Constitution,over and over.

2006-07-22 13:20:52 · answer #10 · answered by kniggs 5 · 0 0

What, you'd have Cheney as President? Maybe if both left and you had Hastert... no, scratch that.

2006-07-22 13:22:43 · answer #11 · answered by Charles G 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers