I've been working as a cook at a small business restaurant for a little less that two weeks now. Unfortunately, it's become too hot for me in the kitchen (I get sick everytime I work now). Family and friends have advised me to go ahead and quit because of this, but I want to know if a two weeks notice is necessary? I really just want to flat out quit, since I know I'll have trouble enduring my notice period, if I can at all.
2006-07-22 10:32:02 · 13 answers · asked by trianguu 1 in Business & Finance ➔ Careers & Employment
No, there is no legal requirement. It might, however, make it difficult to get a good recommendation from your employer. You really should explain it carefully if you have to quit on the spot.
2006-07-22 10:35:54 · answer #1 · answered by Otis F 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
If you are becoming ill every time you work, an explanation of why you can no longer work should be given. Two weeks notice is a matter of courtesy and good business practice. However if you are becoming ill, just explain why you can no longer work there and go!!
2006-07-22 10:39:38 · answer #2 · answered by clogsgalore 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, you need to at least OFFER to give 2 weeks notice. It takes time for employers to find and train your replacement. Consider it "Career Karma". You may need to use them as a reference one day, or they may be able to offer you another position in the company. Always do the RIGHT thing, even when it's not convenient. That is what integrity is :).
2006-07-22 10:37:45 · answer #3 · answered by vbgore 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's not necessary, but it's a nice courtesy. Explain to the manager why you're leaving also. Maybe they'll offer you another position. Don't flat out quit, you never want to burn bridges.
2006-07-22 10:51:59 · answer #4 · answered by Mad Max 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As stated, two weeks is not a legal requirement. I agree with the response to talk to your current employer and let them know why you can't give them two weeks and ask if they will give you a good reference regarding the work you did while you were there!
2006-07-22 10:44:35 · answer #5 · answered by Sheila K 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Technically it is not necessary. Why?..Because, if they fire you, they want you out immediately, right? SO it is just fair!
However, if you are planning to protect your reputation (like most of us) in your industry, you may want to give a 2-week notice. That way, they can give you good reference in your future employer. Also, you don't wanna burn any bridges, if for some reason you want to come back to them.
2006-07-22 10:39:35 · answer #6 · answered by alandicho 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
2 weeks notice is NOT mandatory. It is more of a professional way to handle things especially if you want to use them as a reference. If you can't stand it, and you just don't care then by all means quit. Good luck!
2006-07-22 10:36:02 · answer #7 · answered by Angel 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would explain your situation to your boss and let them know you don't want to leave them in a lurch. Will you need their recomendation at the next job? If not, two weeks notice isn't absoltely necessary, it's just good manners.
2006-07-22 10:37:48 · answer #8 · answered by laura c 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, it is not necessary, but it would likely cost you in terms of using the employer for a reference.
2006-07-22 10:37:00 · answer #9 · answered by cptdrinian 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I"d just quit. I know its not quite ethical but those jobs tend to be a dime a dozen & R f--k you jobs anyway. My older nephew gave that definition! He says it means you get mad . sayf--k u & walk off the job.
2006-07-22 10:41:45 · answer #10 · answered by Sarah 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋