Reason 1: WMD Dismantling - Bunk'd!
Reason 2: Freeing the Iraqi People - Bunk'd!
Reason 3: Fighting Global Terrorism - Bunk'd!
I mean, how many times can you change the reason you are fighting one war??
2006-07-22 10:25:50 · 11 answers · asked by collegedebt 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Ahh.. the Old [Blank] is worse then Hitler Reasoning!
Republicans: Sadaam tortured his own people! That's reason enough for war, even though we are going to turn a blind eye to the civil wars, dictatorships and mass genocides in Africa!!! That doesn't make us hypocrits though!
2006-07-22 10:30:00 · update #1
netjr
Reason 2: Why stop with Iraq if we really give a **** about freeing people? Answer: Because we DONT. We don't care about suffering people, never have and never will so the argument holds zero merit.
Reason 3: Al Qaedi wasn't their until we GAVE THEM A BATTLEGROUND TO FIGHT IN.
2006-07-22 10:34:42 · update #2
Reason 4: Oil
2006-07-22 10:29:57 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, everyone on the Senate Select Intel Committee seen Intel as far back as Clinton's administration, and all agreed that Saddam had WMD, and I think that they were right. You don't call voting for the first time in 30 years free? You don't call women voting, going to school, starting businesses, working... freedom? Where the hell are you from? No attacks since 911, so I've pretty much DEBUNKED you on every count. Your ammo is old, and worn out, and it's obviously not winning you elections.
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002
http://www.usaid.gov/iraq/accomplishments/
2006-07-22 17:39:07 · answer #2 · answered by mojojo66 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Reason #1 WMD's disproven; even with the findings of sarin gas and mustard gas cannisters and shells the world believed Saddam had WMD's including your favored BJ Clinton, Hillary, Kerry, King of France (j/k) and every other socialist dicatator on the planet all thought he had them. Dang even his own generals were asking for them when we invaded - everyone but Saddam figured he had them but you find the means to just blame Bush....how sad for you.
Reason #2 is "bunk'd" how? When was the last time in history a nation conquered another only to turn its control over to a freely elected leadership? Yeah - never.
Reason #3 global terrorism; in case you missed it (and I'm sure you did) al queda had moved in to Iraq before the US invaded. They were in Iraq aftering having fleed Afghanistan...read about al zarkarwi if you don't believe me (and I'm sure you don't).
You need to get off your political one sided liberal far left mantra and get a real life before the al queda network takes yours.
2006-07-22 17:32:11 · answer #3 · answered by netjr 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
When Bush asks the hypothetical question, are the Iraqis better off now then they were under Saddam, the obvious answer is NO.
This is what we get for trying to solve all of the problems of the world.
2006-07-22 17:33:50 · answer #4 · answered by sara 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Reason 4: Saddam Hussein is worse than Hitler! When logic fails just compare someone to Hitler.
2006-07-22 17:28:04 · answer #5 · answered by zippychippy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nice try but you won't get a straight forward answer. We have all been trying for at least a year. The Man is a fool.
2006-07-22 17:29:18 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
1. found, and found lots of evidence of alot more that were moved to other nations
2. they are, they have schools built, girls now go to school, they have stores open (terrorist are now killing thier own poeple sadly)
3, yep, we have stoped alot of them, and keep them too busy to come back to the US
and as the other added, got rid of a killer who was thier leader that killed millions.
2006-07-22 17:38:47 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He thinks foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, but he misunderstood the quotation. He though it meant, if you have a little mind, consistency is foolish.
2006-07-22 17:37:50 · answer #8 · answered by Grist 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, President Chimpy just can't seem to keep his lies straight, can he?
2006-07-22 17:29:14 · answer #9 · answered by The Man In The Box 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
To prove that if Daddy could it, so could he. Both failed miserably.
2006-07-22 17:34:43 · answer #10 · answered by labrat 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋