thats is one of thoose situations that i dont know what i would do untill i was out in that situation.
2006-07-22 10:36:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
I guess it would depend, would I get to actually SEE and be prat of the life of the baby I carried in my womb for 9 months? I always give a different outlook to surrogate motherhood cuz some people just can't have kids together and I feel that's sad because they want to so bad and it's biologically impossible (for homosexual couples and infertile heterosexual couples). And if I knew that the couple or single celebrity would be an extremely good parent and everything else that a child needs in their life to grow into a good person...then I'd say yes. It'd be hard to let go of a child you gave birth to, but if they were good people, I could do it. Lol, I'm answering this even though I'm only 18...but everyone who wants to be a good parent deserves the chance at it right?
2006-07-22 10:33:09
·
answer #2
·
answered by Lady Hurricane 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I wouldn't have a baby for anyone else at any price and for no amount of fame. The whole idea of surrogate motherhood makes me sick. I can't imagine going through 9 months of extreme discomfort, an agonizing labor and then just handing the baby over with a smile. It's disgusting.
2006-07-22 10:10:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by 13th Floor 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yeah, I think I might for like Prince William or maybe Billy Currington. Best wishes
2006-07-22 10:05:02
·
answer #4
·
answered by colorist 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Carry their baby! I love carrying babies. Having a chance to cuddle a baby in my arms is such a treat!
Oops! You meant carry their baby as in for 9 months!
2006-07-22 10:15:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by fnokes 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'd find it too hard to give up the baby once the child was born...celebrity or not!
2006-07-22 10:04:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, because I find the whole idea of surrogate pregnancies unsettling.
2006-07-22 10:08:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋