daneil radcliffe is to old to still be harry potter so who will be the new harry?and same goes for ron and hermoine?
2006-07-22 09:27:19 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
they are not to old they are growing just as much as the characters a book a year a movie a year they are just fine plus there are only 3 movies left anyway
2006-07-22 09:30:44 · answer #1 · answered by OZoNE 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
how can he be too old? He' what? 18 now? he still looked young in the last.
I dont know why Pheonix is set back a year, but the first set back happened with Prisoner when a fire broke out and destroyed a lot of the set for the movie and they had to put off a year to rebuild. But I dont see any reason (at all) to recast. Besides that would really suck after all this to have a new cast. The only cast change so far has been for Dumbledorf and that was because Richard whats hisname died.
2006-07-22 09:31:24 · answer #2 · answered by clomtancy 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
uhhh...your obviously not a fan. their reps have confirmed they are reprieving their roles in the harry potter movies. so ya they are a bit old but its too late to find new actors. plus most ppl would get pissed off and i honestly wouldn't mind a new harry cause daniel radcliffe sucks a** as an actor.
2006-07-22 20:41:05 · answer #3 · answered by reemsh_2003 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
he's not too old he is the right age because in the movie the school is just like anyother school they put you in years and he is a good age to be doing all the movies like an example in the movie ron is the same age as harry and he has 2 brothers that are older than him and they arent off because they are older than harry
2006-07-22 09:32:38 · answer #4 · answered by ♥*~me~*♥ 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think they will change the Harry Potter characters, because they are growing in the book too. And if they did change the people, then I don't think the movie would be as popular as before.
2006-07-22 09:38:58 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
that's a private determination. each and every physique has different likes and dislikes. you're thinking, how can somebody want Harry Potter over Lord Of The jewelry, yet different persons could ask your self why you like Lord Of The jewelry over Harry Potter. that's an argument of opinion and flavor. yet each and every physique could desire to get excitement from observing the action pictures they love and examining the books they love.
2017-01-03 09:20:26 · answer #6 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As far as I know they are still using same actors. I did just hear that 2 of the characters are going to die in the next movie though...
2006-07-22 13:21:41 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
dan's not old,nor is emma.rupert may be.after all when they filmed gof,emma n hermione were same age-14 yrs old. n dan were 15,just older than harry a yr.only rupert is older than ron by 2 yrs. emma looks matured for her age,so she n hermione look same age.
2006-07-24 03:14:19 · answer #8 · answered by Mrs Hermione Potter 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think they will need a new Harry. He gets more and more mature throughout the books so I think it suits Dan.
2006-07-23 12:39:10 · answer #9 · answered by Agnes K 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Say it aint so....
2006-07-22 09:30:27 · answer #10 · answered by Gwragedd Annwn 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋