2006-07-22 08:08:25 · 36 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science ➔ Psychology
1 dead lion would be left
2006-07-22 08:11:46 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
1
2006-07-22 08:47:10 · answer #2 · answered by donworybhapy 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well..
considering that you used the past tense "was" in this question, it means that they are no longer there, so you didnt shoot any of them.
OR...there is no answer to this question because you did not specify if you shot a lion under a tree or a random lion.
OR... there is two lions left.
OR... there is three lions. Because even if you shoot one it doesn't mean its dead. It could just be wounded.
OR... there is three lions, the dead one would still be a lion
:-)
2006-07-22 08:12:24 · answer #3 · answered by Patient Paws 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
left in the world or left under the tree?
There will only one dead lion! The others went away
2006-07-22 08:10:37 · answer #4 · answered by mystery t 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well there could be one dead lion left since the other 2 might run.\
Or 2 lions alive and ready to attack you (wait, I think you'd already be dead in this case) and 1 dead.
2006-07-22 08:20:56 · answer #5 · answered by Laura 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Still 3 - the one you shot and the other 2?
2006-07-22 08:24:17 · answer #6 · answered by Sheba 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well there would be 2 left under the tree.
2006-07-22 08:15:37 · answer #7 · answered by cutieshiloh 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Are you sur you shot @ a lion under a tree? They lie in trees not under them. So you could not have shot @ them.
2006-07-22 08:43:37 · answer #8 · answered by Cantankerous One 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
None the other two would run away. Or the answer could be one dead lion and the other two ran away. Which ever.
2006-07-22 08:13:28 · answer #9 · answered by karen wonderful 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
2 sitting down and 1 very pissed-off lion running full charge in your direction.
2006-07-22 08:19:07 · answer #10 · answered by Skull 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋