English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

That would have to be Saudi Arabia. Why? Well, that's where 15 of the 19 attackers came from on Sept. 11. There were zero attackers from Afghanistan. There were zero attackers from Iraq. There were zero from Iran, from anywhere else in the Middle East (except, possibly, Pakistan). But that's MY view. Osama Bin Laden is safely tucked away somewhere in the U.S. (probably in Florida with Jeb), and Saddam was "caught" in the spider hole (after someone put him there as a photo op for the bushmen. But Saudi Arabia? Never be attacked by the U.S. Now I'll do like the conservatives do on here -- don't bash liberals. Give me a real answer or don't post. How'd you like them apples?????

2006-07-22 07:41:46 · 16 answers · asked by dragonheart 2 in Politics & Government Politics

16 answers

If I could even remotely understand what you are trying to say here I might be inclined to respond to all points but since it's just a bunch of gibberish I have but one piece of advice for you: take an English grammar class, and then maybe a comp. class, before you attempt to engage in meaningful written word.

And if you're looking for places that are not in danger of being attacked by the U.S. (although I am not aware that we are randomly attacking anyone at present) I would say, if you are in the U.S., stay where you are because it is not likely that we will attack ourselves.

Good luck to you.

2006-07-22 07:49:44 · answer #1 · answered by elk312 5 · 0 0

Its a safe place only for the Saudis and its predictible that some day other Islamic groups will say they need to leave one way or another.
Also, there have been no Al Queda attacks against the Saudis. If this group is not welcome there then why is that?
Osama isnt in Florida he doesnt like Pancake House.

2006-07-22 14:52:21 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Utah, and saying the terrorist that flew the planes on 9-11 were from Saudi is silly, they all were muslim terrorist, what part of the middle east they're from makes no difference. Your right about Saudi, but not why you posted, but because they're as fed up with iran and the militants as the rest of the modern middle east is and the free world is.

2006-07-22 14:59:46 · answer #3 · answered by sealss3006 4 · 0 0

To answer the question: the safest place on Earth to avoid a terrosit attack would probably be the middle of the Pacific Ocean.


As to the rest of your statement; good grief. Go take a nap and stop watching TV for a while!

2006-07-22 14:51:35 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I believe that if I felt USA was attack I would go straight to Canada. However, your answer was pretty interesting! I have to disagree about the Islands. I love Jamaica, but during elections it is not a safe place, and the poorer the country the higher the crimes.

2006-07-22 20:36:03 · answer #5 · answered by msshalawn 2 · 0 0

Well, I hate to burst your bubble,but the safest place would be Israel,Canada or England.As to the rest of your Liberal dissertation(you may have to consult Webster's for the definition)it's the same typical tripe you always spout..Can you give PROOF? I thought not.

2006-07-22 14:58:28 · answer #6 · answered by thetdw 4 · 0 0

I think the Carribbean is pretty safe bet. No one wants to bother an area hit by so many hurricanes and so poor already. The area is beautiful and if you give to them without expectations, they give to you as well. But remember, don't expect it! Jamaica is by far the coolest.

2006-07-22 14:45:54 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

well i tell you what if there is an attack fixin to happen me and my hubby will go in the bomb shelter at his work and have to worry about nothin, but that is where attacked by overseas, i think that is the only answer i have lol

2006-07-22 14:46:45 · answer #8 · answered by SUNSHINE 5 · 0 0

Up Bush's buttocks, hence Blair's behaviour

2006-07-22 14:49:35 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Africa ,or any Country that doesn't have oil or money for Bush to take from the people of the country.

2006-07-22 14:46:47 · answer #10 · answered by dvwrg 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers