HE didnt do anything wrong ,didnt he??
2006-07-22 05:53:06 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Liberals claim President Bush shouldn't have started this war.
They complain about his prosecution of it.
One liberal recently claimed Bush was the worst president in US history.
Let's clear up one point:
President Bush didn't start the war on terror.
Try to remember, it was started by terrorists BEFORE 9/11.
Let's look at the worst president and mismanagement claims.
FDR led us into World War II.
Germany never attacked us: Japan did.
From 1941-1945, 450,000 lives were lost,
an average of 112,500 per year.
Truman finished that war and started one in Korea.
North Korea never attacked us.
From 1950-1953, 55,000 lives were lost,
an average of 18,333 per year.
John F. Kennedy started the Vietnam conflict in 1962.
Vietnam never attacked us.
Johnson turned Vietnam into a quagmire.
From 1965-1975, 58,000 lives were lost,
an average of 5,800 per year.
Clinton went to war in Bosnia without UN or French consent.
Bosnia never attacked us.
He was offered Osama bin Laden's head on a platter three times by Sudan and did nothing.
Osama has attacked us on multiple occasions.
Over 2,900 lives lost on 9/11.
NOW, Consider THIS:
In the two years after terrorists attacked us,
President Bush liberated two countries, crushed the Taliban, crippled al-Qaida, put nuclear inspectors in Lybia, Iran and North Korea without firing a shot, captured a terrorist who slaughtered 300,000 of his own people..
We lost 700 soldiers, an average of 350 a year.
Bush did all this abroad while not allowing another terrorist attack at home.
Worst president in history? Come on!
The Democrats are complaining about how long the war is taking,! but...
It took less time to take Iraq
than it took Janet Reno to take the Branch Davidian compound.
That was a 51 day operation.
We've been looking for evidence of chemical weapons in Iraq for less time
than it took Hillary Clinton to find the Rose Law Firm billing records.
It took less time for the 3rd Infantry Division and the Marines to destroy the Medina Republican Guard than it took Teddy Kennedy to call the police after his Oldsmobile sank at Chappaquiddick.
It took less time to take Iraq than it took to count the votes in Florida!!!!
2006-07-22 06:17:13 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
You are right, Angelina. President Bush Knew that he was forced into World War 3 on 9-11-2001. From where I sit he has done pretty good. Liberating Afghanistan from the Taliban, liberating Iraq from Hussein, we have had no attacks on our soil since because he hires the right people to do the job. Thank God we did not he was elected president instead of the other choices. I could ot imagine what shape we would be in if we had two indecisive presidents during the past six years.
2006-07-22 13:11:21 · answer #2 · answered by Thom 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's not because he's a serious George, or a furious George, or even a delirious George. They're against him because he's a curious George!
(And they disagree with the nexus of his policy decisions, which they call a collection of thorough failures. However, many others agree with Bush's decisions, whereas this said nexus aligns with their ideological views and ultimately their fundamental beliefs. He seems like a nice man though.)
2006-07-22 13:44:02 · answer #3 · answered by Captain Hero 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well lets start with something a little rescent. He has authorized the illegal tapping of phone calls. If you remember back in the 70's Richard Nixon was impeached, for what? Why for violation of phone tapping laws. I can not respectr a president that feels he is above the law.
2006-07-22 14:45:51 · answer #4 · answered by Anubis_70 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i am not!
i think u may be being facetious
but really i am not against him
humans are ADDICTED to vilifying others and creating the illusion that that person is bad therefor since i am saying they are bad i must be good!
it is f-ing insanity. Whatever people are rightiously pointing at him - they have plenty of that in themselves!
PLENTY!
2006-07-22 23:43:48 · answer #5 · answered by zigzagidiot 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He has a nice personality outside of politics, but his dealings with politics together with the rest of the government administration may not be agreeable to the rest of us from other parts of the world, especially where it concerns us.
2006-07-22 12:59:44 · answer #6 · answered by blubber 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
he wouldnt be so bad if he didnt destroy the us economy, or he he spent 50% of his time worrying about demestic issues. and it doesnt help that the jewish lobby is a heavy influence on his decisions
2006-07-22 12:58:43 · answer #7 · answered by ryan f 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nah, he just started a war that killed thousands of people.
2006-07-22 12:56:52 · answer #8 · answered by Ricky 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no...who's against him?!!! dont anyone dare report him! he's got a great sense of humour! lol
2006-07-22 13:05:46 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i like him ppl just dont agree with him
2006-07-23 12:48:37 · answer #10 · answered by donielle 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋