English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

6 answers

No, but some people are able to encompass more views in their analysis than others and have different chances to be accepted by others than other people do. People have different mental, emotional and other competencies and different emphaty abilities.

People who pretend to be neutral are most often people who confuse neutrality with passive position. To be passive often pay of, and to be active make nerves for politicians. To be neutral in formulating research task may mean simply social irresponsibility using limited resources of society.

2006-07-22 08:44:47 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I think you can, but it would be a simple line or two. For example there is a war and you could say, “Both sides are in the wrong”. But if your feelings are not completely neutral than you will definitely have some difficulty convincing someone that your are neutral. Also there are times when not saying anything at is not being neutral, like in war (again) you decided to stay neutral and not say anything but there are hundreds of civilians being killed on one side because the other is stronger…you are basically saying you are for the stronger side because you are allowing so many people to be killed.

2006-07-22 12:59:45 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I guess not. (That's how I answered your last question about violations - clean & neutral.) But I guess you're right. You can't be non-committal if you're telling people what you think.

I guess non-inflammatory or inoffensive (maybe even innocuous or bland) would have been better choices.

2006-07-22 12:59:16 · answer #3 · answered by oh kate! 6 · 0 0

Oxymoron.

2006-07-22 14:39:27 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

no because we all have a point of view

2006-07-22 12:58:37 · answer #5 · answered by pete 3 · 0 0

maybe

2006-07-22 12:55:37 · answer #6 · answered by ronald k 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers