English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

i had a still born at 21 weeks gestation. I named him Isaiah. when i get pregnant again, if i have another son, is it wrong to name him the same name? since that name belonged to a totally different person? I really like that name though. what do u think? thanks

2006-07-22 05:19:33 · 15 answers · asked by chapped lips 5 in Health Women's Health

15 answers

My condolences, first of all. I can't even imagine what it must be like to lose a child. If you named the baby though, I think any other son you have should have his own name. If you really like Isaiah, you could use that as a middle name, maybe? In honor of your first son??

2006-07-22 05:37:09 · answer #1 · answered by Tish 5 · 1 1

Of course it is not morally wrong, I am sad to hear of your loss and I don't think that your new child, if it's a boy, would have any objection in being given such a lovely name. However remember that there are no guarantees that he would like any name you may choose for him. It's not a name that makes a person, after all there are thousands and thousands of people named Isaiah, each one being an individual. If I were you and you have a son name him Isaiah. Stop worrying what other people think and give your child the name of your choice.
Good luck with everything.

2006-07-22 06:12:56 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It would not be morally wrong, but would you expect this baby to replace the still born child? Would the name be a constant reminder of the first Isaiah? If so, name the next baby something else. Sorry for your loss. In time you won't forget, but it won't sadden you so much. No child can ever be replaced. As you already said the name belonged to a totally different person. Name the new baby what will please you and your spouse; especially if you can answer no to my questions. Good luck!

2006-07-22 05:38:32 · answer #3 · answered by Chris 5 · 0 0

There is nothing wrong with calling you next pregnancy (son) Isaiah. For first or middle name. Look at it this way, George Forman, has how many sons, named George, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and so on.

2006-07-22 05:28:55 · answer #4 · answered by Moose 6 · 0 0

It would be a good idea to make sure they have different middle names or use Isaiah as your second son's middle name. It is important to name the lost child a unique name in order to mourn and honor that name for healing purposes. I wouldn't worry about what other people think - but what is best for you and your healing heart.
Maybe you will have a girl this time! Little girls are wonderful!

2006-07-22 05:41:23 · answer #5 · answered by petlover 5 · 0 0

You already have a son named Isaiah. It doesn't matter that he is dead, he is still your son. In my opinion, it would be completely wrong to name another child Isaiah. Why would you have two children with the same name? And frankly, I wouldn't want to be named after my dead brother.

2006-07-22 05:25:19 · answer #6 · answered by Taffi 5 · 0 0

No, not at all. Besides you liking the name, it would be a special way of honoring someone that meant alot to you.
Also, if you tell the second son about your first son's name and present the information to him in a way that makes it seem an honor, he will probably be happy to have the name.

2006-07-22 05:34:12 · answer #7 · answered by horses 2 · 0 0

I don't think it would be morally wrong, but it would not be a good idea. Perhaps something similar like Isaac would be an option, but I just don't think that naming a second son the same as the one who has passed is a smart idea. Good luck to you.

2006-07-22 05:47:03 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Lincoln Benedict may be proper! the purely concern that I see is that it should be stressful to spell beforehand each project for him via silent "L". as well the straightforward undeniable actuality that, Lincoln is by skill of ability of no ability unprecedented so it will be elementary for each guy or female else to spell, and he will learn it purely positive. which couldn't overly customer-pleasant or uncommon; i have were given self belief it somewhat is score replaced into someplace interior the mid-200s. it somewhat is two syllables, does not commence up with G, and that is a historic call. i recognize the decision Benedict, so it replaced into impressive to workout habitual that as a center call decision. finally, i imagine of Lincoln Benedict and Julius Arthur sound fantastic at the same time! both names are very captivating. strong success! ?

2016-12-10 13:33:22 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i sat and thought about this question for a while, it really is a hard one to answer. when it comes to morals it's hard to see things in black and white. you would have to ask yourself what measures you would take to protect yourself and your child. is your second baby going to know there was a first? are you naming him isaiah to REPLACE your first child? are you willing to remind yourself on a daily basis about your first child? is the father willing to deal with these things as well?

2006-07-22 05:41:10 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers