Unification of forces ?why / dont all forces manifest themselves mutually exclusively?

Question

So how can one make forces mutually inclusive(that is force unification) when atuually we ofserve forces as being mutually exclusive?
Was it not Einstein's conclusion that a Force IS a Force?

Note =forces dont exist by themelves.so when we talk about force there has to be a reflected force and mass?

so 4 fources in nature would give a total of 8 forces .

also forces are never static.

Answer 1

Forces of Nature : THE SPIN.

In 1687, the book "Mathematical beginnings of natural philosophy"
by Isaac Newton was printed out. This book has become the fundamental
scientific textbook. In the foreword to this book, Newton has written:
"All the difficulty of physics, as it will be seen, is in recognizing
forces of the nature by the phenomena of motion,
and then to explain other phenomena according to these forces".
"The First Newton's law" breaks on the spot
this well formulated logical thought.
It states:
"Any body, until it remains insulated,
saves its state of rest or rectilinear motion".
This law of motion is considered fundamental in classic physics.
However, it permanently causes critics of initial positions of mechanics.
Because in earthly conditions it is defaulted.
This law does not take into consideration influence of external forces
; it also says nothing about internal forces. The reason on which the body
is moving or rests is not clear. This law is abstract.
Newton perceived illusiveness of this law. His scientific slogan was:
"I do not invent hypotheses".
He said: "I shall not mix conjectures with reliability".
He aimed to build a building of science without hypotheses.
Therefore, he wanted to correct somehow, to change his formulation.
But all attempts were unsuccessful.
However, this law is useful and necessary to explain then accelerated motion.
For this reason, this postulate of Newton
was forced and wrongfully erected to a rank of the law.
And from a school bench the person learns this postulate
as the law (unproved supposition). Here we have the paradoxical situation.
The Bible begins with the unfounded statement
"In the Beginning there was a Word ",
and classic physics begins with the unfounded statement
" In the Beginning there was the First Newton's law ".
The science states that the origin of the World according
to the religious version is not reliable, and builds the scientific
foundations based on abstraction. As a result, both formulations
(religious and scientific) are unsatisfactory from the point of view of logic.
====================================
Newton,s dream was realized by Planck.
let us analyze the discovery of quantum of light by Planck.
M. Planck in 1900 offered to examine the radiation emanating from
absolutely black body (Vacuum radiation of Kirchhoff /Max Laue / ),
as separate portions (quantum).
If the quantum of light will penetrate inside this absolute black body
and will not reflect back, the radiation and heat will die.
That it will not happen, the ideal black body should reflect
(radiate) this quantum of light back. Then and only then,
this initial (natural) radiation of quantum of light is characterized
by the constant of Planck -h .
The quantity of this particle, s impulse is h=1.
Under influence of this impulse the particle moves with speed c=1.
The particle has the form of a circle.
This quantity is described with a formula (h=Et) and has a title of
“the least quantum of action”,“ internal impulse of particle”, “spin”.
================================
Einstein realized Newton,s dream in another way
For the basic point of his argumentations, Einstein
took the constant of Boltzmann R/N = k
and coefficient (b) from the formula of radiation of Wien.
The multiplication of these two quantities gives the formula
of “ internal impulse of particle”, “spin” h = kb.
================================
Quantum of light is a privileged particle.
Only the speed of a light quantum in Vacuum has
a maximal, constant, absolute quantity of c=1.
No other particle can travel with the speed c = 1.
If quantum of light flies always rectilinearly c=1, it is a mad one.
Is he really mad?
========================================
No.
Goudsmit-Uhlenbeck also realized Newton,s dream.
Another impulse (spin) in 1925 was found by
Goudsmit-Uhlenbeck .
They came to a conclusion, that the particle should have other impulse.
Quantity of this impulse is described with a formula : ћ = h/ 2 π,
forcing a particle to rotate around his diameter.
This means that it particle does not move rectilinearly,
but rotates around the diameter (has the form of a sphere).
The rotation of these particle creates electrical waves.
========================
So, when Newton wrote many years ago:
"All the difficulty of physics, as it will be seen, is in recognizing
forces of the nature by the phenomena of motion,
and then to explain other phenomena according to these forces",
Planck, Einstein, Goudsmit and Uhlenbeck realized his desire .

Answer 2

1

Answer 3

The theory goes that the 4 fundamental forces are really different manifestations of a single, unified force. We see them as 4 different forces because at these low temperatures it causes many different effects. By artificially inducing conditions in particle accelerators which approximate those just after the big bang, we've been able to observe this to some extent. Equations have been developed for "Strong Electromagnetics" which is a single equation which can describe the both the strong force and the electromagnetic force. We are also getting close to integrating the weak force into the framework, if not there already.

Answer 4

Well, before Maxwell, the electric and the magnetic forces were seen as different and acting independently. What Maxwell found is that they could be combined into a single theory. The hope is that the other forces can be treated in similar ways. For example, the weak force has already been unified into the electromagnetic force. It is now called the electroweak force. There are strong suggestions that the strong force can be treated in the same way, although the technicallities are more difficult. The odd one out seems to be gravity, but strong theory gets that one into the picture also.

Answer 5

First, forces are, of themselves, never seen. No matter what the force, the energy forming that force is never directly seen.

There is a reason for this. It is found in the physics trilogy:

E = mc2, which we all know the reason for.

m = E/c2, that describes mass as being composed of energy being reduced to the lowest value "c". This value is also that for physical time, or a gravitational field.

c2 = E/m, indicates that all energy and mass forms are able to be equated directly to that of the value of c2. It is the value of "c2" that we are interested in, in order to answer your question.

This value is that of a particular force of energy that we equate as being phyiscal time. This value also describes how long it will take to perform a particular job (work). Mass is composed of physical time, and this value is that of "c". It is for this reason that all clocks are able to relate with each other. Time gains more than one dimension when formed into three dimensinal mass (this done by agency of the electron, and then these into larger particles). As a mass begins moving, it changes its energy values so that greater frequency is in forward dimension, and proportionatelly less at right angles to that direction.

What this means, is that any form of energy has as its basis that of electromagnetic energy, and this is the common force in all matter and energy structures.

Lastly, this is seen in the frequency trilogy:

hf = E, is how energy is determined in electromagnetic energy. The greater the frequency, the greater the energy.

hf = mk, is that of kinetic energy. In that mass is composed of electromagnetic energy, mass attains the same values as does that for "E" as it moves.

hf = c, is that for gravitational waves. These waves are the basis for all mass and energy values, and appears to be the foundation of our existence.

The value of "c" demonstrates that everything in our universe moves from the present to the past at this speed, and if it does not move at this speed, then it does not exist to us.

Answer 6

first of all "mutually exclusive" is kind of an oxy moron. second- gravity is an s.o.b. it just throws everything off
or keeps it on, :)