2006-07-22 04:41:34 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
With our tax money and weapons
2006-07-22 04:41:49 · update #1
You are right?? The biggest terrorist is well known , but all people are afraid from saying that.
2006-07-22 05:03:11 · answer #1 · answered by R.M.IRAQI 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Seen any Hezbollah aircraft lately? Hey? You ever see the size of one of their tanks? No? Yeah...me neither. Their rocket launchers aren't too bad though. Good for the elemnt of initial surprise but...*sigh* if only they had a jet or helicopter...or two. Then maybe they could keep those pesky Israeli jets from blasting over 50% of into cosmic bits. Along with their crews. Not to mention of course I was wondering why Israel just hasn't gotten with the program like those military strategists at Hezbollah. When will they equipt all of their soldiers with 25 pounds (50 kilos for you other folks) of C-4 (or the occasional dud motar shell) to their chests and send them forward? Worked for the Japanese, right?
Yep...and it all comes down to this. As long as you insist upon carrying your battles in urban settings this is the price. You choose to place your own people, your own countrymen in jepoardy then this sadly is the result. Tensions being what they are and always have been, the kidnapping of the soldiers was stupid and a suicidal gesture. Now look what's happening. You draw a line in the sand and dare someone to step over it you're asking for trouble.
2006-07-22 04:56:38 · answer #2 · answered by Quasimodo 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Using that logic the police are a terrorist organization. Why are we giving tax dollars weapons to them?
2006-07-22 04:52:49 · answer #3 · answered by Bill 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Strange who we call the terrorists. It seems like if a person trespasses on other people's lands with huge US made weapons, to steal oil and land, then the helpless people there are labeled terrorists for resisting.
2006-07-22 04:51:54 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't Hezbolla invade Israel and kidnap two of its soldiers? And hasn't Hezbollah swarn to destroy the Israeli state? Israel may have overreacted in their response and seem a bit paranoid, but even paranoids have enemies. In this case, their enemies are very real.
2006-07-22 04:50:12 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
pay interest - uve been brainwashed by using the media. hezbullah and hamas cover in the back of civilians. those are cowardly terrorists who dont supply a crap about civilian lives. israel has warned many cases by ability of pamphlets and signs and indicators and comprehend-how publicizes for all civilians to go away everywhere the position hezbullah is energetic reason they're going to attack. all and sundry who doesnt go away is of route sending an fantastically sparkling message as to the position their loyalties lie. so the media has performed its pastime properly. u, besides as many different ppl, imagine that israel likes killing electorate and they are attacking way out of percentage. properly shall we assume of about this. israel is a small united states of america which wasnt attacking all and sundry. squaddies get killed and abducted for no reason. israel needs their squaddies decrease back so that they go on an offensive, attacking purely protection rigidity strongholds and hezbullah outposts as antagonistic to hezbullah which assaults haifa and different cities, which aren't from now on concentrated by using protection rigidity approach, yet quite by using very incontrovertible certainty that they could reason the most terror in those places. and shall we no longer forget, as i already reported, that those protection rigidity strongholds and workplaces of hezbullah are places which take position to be hidden in the back of the civilians. israel warns many cases and then fires. so who's fairly at fault? its time to be honest with your self. U comprehend that Israel has performed no longer some thing incorrect. If u were a frontrunner of a united states of america and three of ur squaddies were abducted, might want to u only say "who cares, it is purely 3 squaddies"? of route no longer. and plus, if israel didnt reply, it might want to keep on taking position. thats why israel wont even evaluate a prisoner swap with those terrorists reason they comprehend that once they even make one deal (it truly is thoroughly rediculous - thousands of lebonise, lots of which murdered harmless jewish ppl, for 3 squaddies who've performed no longer some thing yet take care of civilians) more effective squaddies receives abducted and terrorism will be effective. we ought to no longer supply into those ppl. no longer now, under no circumstances!
2016-11-25 01:40:05 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
"killing civilians" is not the definition of terrorism. If you knew anything at all about what's going on over there, you wouldn't need to ask such an ignorant question.
2006-07-22 04:46:13 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Killing civilians ON PURPOSE is terrorism.
"Collateral damage" in a "legitimate" operation aimed against military does not count.
Sad but true.
2006-07-22 05:38:30 · answer #8 · answered by hq3 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because he is trying to oppress his people and not allow them to live a life of freedom. He is a dictator. Could you live like that?
2006-07-22 04:49:21 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Maybe it has something to do with the motives behind tha actions.
2006-07-22 04:57:13 · answer #10 · answered by M.McNulty 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋