English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I saw that for the House vote to support Israel, the only people to not support it, in a both democrat and republican supported resolution, were the people from Michigan. State with the highest Muslim population. They news said it was because they are doing this for their voting blocks? So their voting blocks, in Michigan, are terrorists? They support Hezbollah? They support Bin Laden and his people? My thinking if I live there, is really to wonder who we elected? You people are already screwed by letting organized crime..I mean labor , take over your jobs but you better get your heads out of the sand with this story. Anyone else see that?

2006-07-22 01:09:27 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

9 answers

I once visited Dearborn (which is Muslim heaven) and I can tell you this is a dangerous place. Not dangerous in the way that Gary Indiana or Paterson New Jersey are, but dangerous to the whole principle of Democracy. These people want to set up a Shariah state here in America.

We should be very careful about letting any Muslims into America. They don't comprehend what Democracy or freedom is all about. To them fair is what Allah says is fair.

2006-07-22 01:25:20 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Let me guess, was this story on O'Reilly? It amazes me that the neocons relish the nickname "dittoheads", from the days of Limbaugh, in that they will parrot anything they hear from their propaganda machine.

OK, OK. Maybe the Michigan representatives, coming from the state with the highest Muslim population, are doing their constitutional duty and representing their people. Maybe they have more exposure to the Muslim viewpoint and know that not all Americans support Israel's actions.

We know that the neocons, with their 47% majority, believe that they now speak for all America, but that doesn't make it true. Lumping Republican "party-line" and Democrat "party-line" together still doesn't speak for all America.

"Good job" to the Michigan representatives, giving voices to other Americans.

Personally, I do not support Israel's actions. But I support the United States of America.

2006-07-22 08:29:30 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Whatever the stats are, the day America becomes a Muslim-run country is the day good Americans better take it bacK! Simple as that. End of issue.

As for Michigan itself, the football team sux because they couldn't even beat rival OSu in the Big House last year, which cost me plenty.

And I have a wedding invite to Kalamazoo in November, but don't think I will go. It sounds like a jihad name to me!!!

2006-07-23 09:24:21 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Go back and learn some facts.

Michigan doesn't have the highest Muslim population. Far from it.

California and Michigan each are about 2% Muslim. Although Michigan has a lot of people (10,100,000+, 8th largest), it is far smaller than California (36,100,000+).

2006-07-22 18:53:58 · answer #4 · answered by AF 6 · 0 0

Michigan not a bad state now their football team is No good their player that nobody wanted.Their coach are over age pee wee football coach their M club is for people who can spell

2006-07-22 08:17:04 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

So, let me get this straight, if they DON'T support a country that kills a few hundred children, amongst hundreds of others, because two of yopur people got kidnapped, you are THEY are the terrorists? I think you have things backwards...

2006-07-22 08:14:43 · answer #6 · answered by Gungnir 5 · 0 0

THAT'S SOMETHING I COULD NEVER FIGURE OUT. WHY SOME AMERICAN'S SUPPORT TERRORISTS, LIKE LIBERALS FOR EXAMPLE. IT JUST BLOWS ME AWAY. I THINK IF THEY FEEL THAT WAY MAYBE THEY SHOULD GO LIVE IN MEXICO TOO. I FEEL VERY STRONGLY ABOUT AMERICA AND I REALLY HATE TO SEE PEOPLE MISTREAT IT.

2006-07-22 13:23:56 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

All they gotta do is vote for uncle Ted up there!

2006-07-22 08:43:39 · answer #8 · answered by itsallover 5 · 0 0

They are representing their constituents not a special interest group....I though you supported that idea????

2006-07-22 08:33:23 · answer #9 · answered by mymadsky 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers