2006-07-21 21:01:48 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
there are also women in the military, and pentegon. so its no all us guys.
2006-07-21 21:06:22 · answer #1 · answered by Cole FANTASTIC 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
am i able to assume you're male by using your demonstrate call (brad)? i do not see why you've a difficulty with it. it truly is human nature. it fairly is all. a guy is meant to guard a woman. it fairly is how human beings were "designed" to be able to speak. I honestly don't have any difficulty with women in a helping position, however it might want to be folly to position women in a strive against position with men round. this isn't meant to be sexist, only the certainty, yet women are distractions on the battlefield. ignore how the media may have a field day exhibiting injured lady squaddies, a male soldier will be a lot less possibly to finish his project because he needs to keep a wounded lady comrade. it truly is instinct. to keep any female who's "component to the tribe" (our tribes have taken the kind of international locations lol.) bodily and mentally, maximum women are certainly a lot less able than men in combating, it truly is likewise certainty, no longer prejudice. women are of route more effective susceptable to torture (also of route, sexual). you may want to possibly improve the ladies's actual stream as a counter-argument, and that i'm no longer going to argue antagonistic to that, yet i will say that i'm chuffed leaving issues as they're and under no circumstances making women so equivalent to men, that they strive against at the front lines. women and men are similar, yet they nonetheless have ameliorations. to assert they're completely a similar is to flee certainty. As a very last word. the purely way i might want to work out this operating isn't any matter if it truly is an all lady unit no longer operating in live performance with male gadgets. in reality a lone unit. so for reconnaisance and sniping i wager they could workout positive (however the linked disadvantages are nonetheless there)
2016-11-25 01:22:47 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would - and have - fought to try to protect my family. I would fight to defend my integrity. But over, as you put it, an inch of dirt. I don't think so. But I'm a woman. I guess a man needs to answer this one.
2006-07-21 21:07:40 · answer #3 · answered by the other one 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wow. I know lots of girls who create war too. Specifically over a man. lol
2006-07-21 21:05:05 · answer #4 · answered by Private Account 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Men will often fight over women.
Women also fight, but not always with physical violence.
2006-07-21 21:06:08 · answer #5 · answered by John 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Men has also started war over a woman. They have macho egos, they're idiots.
2006-07-21 21:04:59 · answer #6 · answered by creeklops 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
We were just discussing Elizabeth I, Victoria, and Bloody Mary .
2006-07-22 07:20:30 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
To protect our women and children
2006-07-21 21:07:54 · answer #8 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
IT'S BECAUSE OF THEIR TESTOSTERONE-DRIVEN EGO AND THE FACT THAT THEY DON'T GIVE BIRTH, THE REASON WHY THEY DO NOT VALUE THE LIFE OF OTHERS THAT MUCH.
2006-07-22 04:04:06 · answer #9 · answered by eli 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
coz its a male dominated society
2006-07-21 21:06:26 · answer #10 · answered by WOLVERINE 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋