Would non-violent civil disobedience be more effective then suicide bombing?

Question

Who believes that Palestinians would have greater success if they adopted the principles espoused by Gandhi and MLK.

Jack. I was not looking for a hateful response. Thank you.

Answer 1

Probably. And diplomacy would be better results than bombing from the other side. Violence never works - it only multiplies.

Answer 2

Suicide bombing really isn't effective at all. It only add fuel to the fire, it doesnt win the war, or even the battle. The opens the eyes of peoples of the world at how evil muslims are, whether the media reports it as such or not. People are not fools, and although they feel symphaty for Palestinians, they also see them for what they are when they do this. Muslims attack using terrorism. Instilling fear creates hatred in people, and dont think for a moment that even the leftist is not aware of what Islam really stands for. The left hates the right, so it hasnt spoken out much, yet. But there will come a day when every muslim man, woman, and child will be hated by the world. War is coming.

Answer 3

Depends on if you are fighting a war or protesting an issue.

In war, suicide bombing is extremly effective. Who wants to fight a suicide bomber? No one! A suicide bomber has the potential to do great physical damage to the enemy as well as psychological. A suicide bomber also has no hope of a situation improving and is usually reserved as a last ditch effort to deal the enemy a blow.

Peacefully protesting is not necessarily a tactic of war but a voicing of opinions or discontent. Unlike suicide bombers, protesters usually are hopeful a situation may improve.

In the case of the Palestinians, some are desperate and others are hopeful. I think the best tactic of the Palestinians would be to use diplomacy.

Answer 4

My Atheist boyfriend says it isn't organic. From a clinical element of view, it isn't. The sex section, besides. Marriage is only a criminal bond and is a funny tale lately. enable them marry, they're only going to get divorced like such numerous interior the hetero international. No enormous difference, fairly.

Answer 5

obviously yes.

non-violent civil disobedience is effective at generating peace and positive change.
suicide bombing promotes further conflict.

Answer 6

I do not. The cultures they are fighting do not understand civil disobedience, so it would be ineffective. Sad, but true.

Answer 7

http://www.ghaliboun.net/gallery/displayimage.php?album=11&pos=3

Answer 8

And what other way is there beside these two choices. I don't like either one of them.