2006-07-21 17:35:35 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science ➔ Other - Social Science
You have to ask why? If they send their own kids, and the kids predictably I don't know... died or came home without legs, they might have to rethink their own position.
2006-07-21 17:46:42 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Because they're using the basis of "pro-war" to create an artificial reality, where they and their families can live comfortably, without having to get involved.
It's the same, really, for many other situations. People often like to criticise and comment or even encourage but they rarely like to involve themselves. It's often always about "others" but rarely about "yourself".
2006-07-22 04:41:15 · answer #2 · answered by Who, me? 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Or serve in a war themselves? Like our dear president? And vice president? Hmm...I wish I could answer that, but you'd have to ask them. However, it seems they're so good at avoiding such dire things as combat that they're extraordinarily skilled at avoiding any questions at all regarding that subject.
2006-07-22 00:40:07 · answer #3 · answered by lc_frosh 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Another question that proves that stereotypes are wrong.
I knew two guys at Ft. Benning that were sons of US elected representatives. Both ended up serving in Iraq.
2006-07-22 19:57:55 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Do as they say..not as they do thats the motto for hypocites like this
2006-07-22 00:42:41 · answer #5 · answered by hatingmsn 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You misspelled "advocate." And you fail at sentential syntax and grammar. YOU LOSE.
2006-07-22 00:40:10 · answer #6 · answered by BlackAdder_MB 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
THEY ARE SHREWD, CUNNING & CALCULATING BUSINESS-MEN
2006-07-22 00:59:57 · answer #7 · answered by BHANU V. RAVAL 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋