Me, I know.
To answer your question, ya possibly.
He wanted to finish what daddy started.
I had a close friend over there in Iraq. Bush doesn't care what this war costs, and from a person who has been there first hand, it's bad there, really, really bad. We have done nothing but further damage a poverty stricken torn land and people. It's a terrible shame and I can not believe it has gone on this long.
Nothing is better since it started. We are hated even more by our world neighbors, gas is sky high, thousands of our soldiers have been killed not to mention the tens of thousands of Iraq and Afghanistan civilians, and meanwhile Lil Kim is pointing bombs toward American and no one seems to care.
It's really scary.
2006-07-21 16:27:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by princesszoe 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
right. The IRA was a huge international network that could pull off a million dollar attack. Where the crap did you hear that from? I've done extensive studying on the IRA's history, and it's news to me they were a global threat in 2001.
Like liberals are so fond of saying, I'd like to see some references for this claim (and it better not be Bill O'Reilly).
2006-07-21 16:29:38
·
answer #2
·
answered by cirque de lune 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
nock'n off the IRA is for queen 'n country.
Last I checked none of the 911 terrorists trained in Ireland.
Hey, if you fellas need a hand with the IRA, let us know - we'll probably help out.
and for Bush - He's a politician - of course his activities are for personal gain. (House of commons does the same) and they're all about as worthless as Bush too.
2006-07-21 16:23:55
·
answer #3
·
answered by jjttkbford 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
i imagine there must be some actuality to this. there have been countless former Bush administration officials which have come out antagonistic to the Bush administration. Bush's former press secretary has. His head of the workplace of criminal council signifies that the Bush administration push him to position in writing criminal reviews that crossed the line of legality so that they could legally damage out with doing unlawful acts. And now this from the former US native land safe practices chief. those people were employed because they were extremely conservative. those are not liberals aiming assaults on the former Bush administration. those are extremely conservatives that were hand picked by using the Bush administration to artwork for them because they were extremely conservative. a tale turns right into a lot extra plausible even as it comes from people of a similar political social gathering. And Tom Ridge is by using far no longer the first to accuse his former bosses of misdeeds.
2016-10-15 01:45:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by sandeep 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes I do know that, and if some of the others that answered this question would get there news from somewhere other that Fox they would know that too.. Just a suggestion to some of you try getting your news from other sources like the BBC or some other foreign news service, basically anything is more reliable than Faux News!!!!
2006-07-21 17:04:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by The Prez. 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The IRA is a British internal affair. Wow, you are so far off-base, I don't even know where to start.
2006-07-21 16:26:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by beren 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The IRA or New IRA hasn't really warred us, so uhh..nah..but I definately don't agree with their terrorist aims.
I don't believe they have the biggest terrorist army. Hezbolla would be up there on that scale.
2006-07-21 16:21:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by Kah K 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bush is excited about Armageddon,,, the final battle in his world
2006-07-21 16:25:50
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Look everyone, liberals live in the UK too. Oh how sweet. They didn't attack us, duh! Nor are they out to kill every "infidel" they can, and believe it or not, that includes you.
2006-07-21 16:24:24
·
answer #9
·
answered by Saved 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
OMG... do you really believe that junk you just shoveled?
2006-07-21 16:22:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋