2006-07-21 14:54:25 · 13 answers · asked by coxfranklin 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
No.
22nd Amendment: "No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once."
2006-07-21 14:57:23 · answer #1 · answered by coragryph 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not a US President No.
The highest number of years a president can serve is 10 and that is only the case if he is vice president and the president resigns/dies after the 2 year mark, then the vice-president who is now president can run for two more terms. Otherwise, no he(she) cant
2006-07-21 14:59:01 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No -- the only way a president could thoretically serve for more than two terms is if that person were vice president and became president because the "real" president died or resigned. Then that person could still run for two terms. But, two terms is the max!
2006-07-21 14:59:24 · answer #3 · answered by tsopolly 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no two is the limit....however if a person is vice president and the president dies or some other way has to leave office mid-term, if it is less than half way through the term the vice-president can finish out that term then be elected two more times, for a total of just less than 10 years.
2006-07-21 14:58:55 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. They are only allowed two terms in office.
The only time they could serve more that eight years is if they were first the vice president and take over for a president who dies in office, in which the maximum term in office can be up to ten years and no more.
2006-07-21 14:58:23 · answer #5 · answered by Shaula 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no one person can serve no more than 2 terms
2006-07-21 15:07:24 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i imagine someone may cost quite journey with how existence changed into for the time of those Administrations perchance quite in yet differently than historic recaps you modern. in accordance to existence journey for the reason that Eisenhower's 2d time period, Ike created the Interstate systm, a tremendous component. Kennedy had concepts and lifelike economic rules, a tremendous component. Johnson inspired Civil Rights, a tremendous component; he also speeded up a warfare of Ideology, a foul component (own journey). Nixon tried common skill to win the warfare, then pulled the plug, finally, a tremendous component. Nixon reached out to our adversaries, a tremendous component. Nixon turned right into a scumbag, a foul component. Ford, kept abode., Carter, inept and beaten, a foul component. Reagen, united states felt good about each little thing, hoorah. Bush a million, united states went to warfare with a justification, a plan, an Alliance, execution and go out. united states changed into proud, a tremendous component. Bush raised taxes, and the commercial equipment sank, a foul component. Clinton turned right into a tremendous economist, kept the Balkens and stopped genocide,a tremendous component. He neglected opportunities with Terroists by using being Politically superb, a foul component. He turned right into a tremendous President that dealt with Natonal safe practices as a regulation enforcement count number, inexperience perchance, no longer a tremendous component. Bush 2 dealt with 9/11 on behalf of a startled u . s ., and through the Afgan protection rigidity action, he succeeded, a tremendous component. He maintained the Iraq UN Resolutions with Britain, a tremendous component. He went to warfare on a pretend impact, a failure of our international Alliance on safe practices Intelligence, a foul component. He depended on Rumsfeld's warfare making plans and exceeded over Collin Powells "overwhelming rigidity doctrine", a foul component. Bush had an unemployment cost of as low as 4.2% and as severe as 6.4%, no longer undesirable. He had a Republican Congress, then a Democratic Congress at a time even as he, his administration and maximum in Congress knew Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were bancrupt alongside with each Insitution they'd dealings with, a finished damage down in Governance, a foul component.
2016-10-15 01:42:18 · answer #7 · answered by sandeep 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. It would be a good idea for you to read the US Constitution.
2006-07-21 14:58:06 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
nope...max two terms...fo sheezy...total
2006-07-21 14:57:32 · answer #9 · answered by SANCHO 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not sure
2006-07-21 14:57:29 · answer #10 · answered by SpectacularVernacular 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋