English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

This is a Scientific question that may include many disciplines. If you believe it belongs under a different catagory, please let me know.

2006-07-21 14:41:14 · 4 answers · asked by TommyTrouble 4 in Science & Mathematics Biology

Molecular disassociation. Hydroscopic pressure. Covalent bonding. Meniscus. Polymers. Organic Compounds. Premoial soup. External influences. etc...etc......

2006-07-21 15:25:06 · update #1

Primordial LOL ;-)

2006-07-21 15:26:13 · update #2

Some Dude
Me thinks a "modified" version of this is more likely 8-)

2006-07-22 08:01:31 · update #3

4 answers

I'm partial to the RNA world hypothesis:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RNA_world_hypothesis

2006-07-21 17:00:33 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

The abiogenesis. Where is said the the living things come from the non living one. I disagree with that.

As the scientist nowdays, that theory is all ready truncated and ruin. It is not making any sense.

Even tough I think in the first time of earth happened,,, There are no any living organism. But that first irganisms, which is the uni-cell one are said to be created by the reaction og the non-living material. They are the chemical substances. Like water , O, P, Cl , and the electric current. Who knows ????

After that that uni-cell organis will evolvled into the multi-cellular one. And we are included into that. So.....

The conclusion. The abiogenesisi one may occur in the first time of life in the earth induced. But after that there are no more abiogene existed.

Only 4JJI kows the answer

2006-07-21 21:51:43 · answer #2 · answered by Double Helix 2 · 0 0

abiogenesis doesn't exist. Life does not come from non-life. The only time when it could be said to have occured was back when life began, which was only because certain specific environmental conditions existed then which do not exist anymore. If you are in fact talking about the origin of life, I'd be happy to explain further.

I say "could be said to have occured" because it wasn't that life just appeared from non-life, but that there was a process over timer, and it would be very difficult to say at which point life could be declared to exist separately than chemicals.

2006-07-21 21:46:21 · answer #3 · answered by DakkonA 3 · 0 0

You'll like the book "Genesis: The Scientific Quest for Life's Origins" - Hazen.

There are several competing ideas.

2006-07-21 21:54:48 · answer #4 · answered by skeptic 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers