Who else agrees that President Bush is doing an outstanding job of running this country?

Answer 1

Well I'll say one thing for you, you have more backbone than he has, to post such a question. I'm from Texas and he was Governor here as you should know. He did nothing outstanding, while his dad was doing a good job in Washington. So all I can say is if the people of the U.S wont's this country run this way, then don't gripe because it's messed up. I don't like him, never have or will. Give me More men like Truman or Ike. I think his dad should have named him Sue. Maybe then he would be a fighter. But I can't put it all on him, he has 1/3 power and the Congress the other 2/3 thirds. If the members of congress don't like you, they will not give the help or backing. It's not called the good old boys club for nothing.

Answer 2

I think he's done Ok.

POTUS is a lousy job to have. They ethier love you or hate you. It doesn't pay well, living in DC sucks, and the whole world wants you to solve every problem. You Avg CEO, makes more and has less headaches. Considering the other options? I'm glad he's the guy in 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.

Seriously people. Kerry? The only thing he's every done is marry a rich widow & get money for the Big DIg. Gore? You've got to be kidding.......

Answer 3

Okay, first of all, people love Reagon now because he is DEAD. Any political science teacher will tell you that Reagon was not a very good president. And "Kill the murdering terrorists" come on, can you not see how irrational that logic is. Historians, myself, and 2/3 of the American public see Bush as one of the worst Presidents in history; Clinton is ranked only as mediocore (which I would take over one of the worst any day). Outstandingly bad, perhaps.

Answer 4

given all he has to deal with, I'd say he's doing a pretty decent job. I don't think he's perfect by far. But he is doing better than most people credit him for.
Remember, people talked about Reagan this way (Ray-Gun they thought that was so clever) and they said he was an airhead.
At the end of the day, I'd rather be alive and safe, and hearing them badmouth the government, than to let them have their way.

Answer 5

You must be living in an alternate reality, because the reality I live in, Bush is a terrible president. He should have been charged with war crimes when he started this war. And because of this war, I will never like Bush.

Answer 6

Only about 35% of the country

Answer 7

I dont think that he is a good president at all! he is not articulate in a language that he grew up with, he addresses the media concerning Saddam Hussein and said "this is the man who tried to kill my daddy" what the ****! like seriously! you dont do or say such a thing when you have such a high and public job! as i said he is not a good president but i dont know him as a person....

Answer 8

i'm gonna be beneficiant and supply Bush a C for final nighttime. I take it as an admission that his lifelong philosophy of and faith in "the magic of the industry" is in blunders, and that good markets do not handle themselves, they want government oversight and administration. however the devil is in the small print: what sort of oversight is Bush keen to settle for? Paulson's unique plan reported no oversight, no judicial overview -- it fairly is unacceptable. Bush now says "Any rescue plan might desire to additionally be designed to confirm that taxpayers are secure. it would welcome the participation of economic institutions, great and small. it would confirm that failed executives do not acquire a providence out of your tax money." And he says "it would set up a bipartisan board to supervise the plan's implementation, and it would be enacted as quickly as conceivable." ok, yet we want greater information. If some executives lied approximately their companies' status, we'd desire to claw lower back their mega-million salaries and deliver them to penal complex. And we choose a attractiveness of the final sort new rules will take. Bush needs to place off till the unspecified destiny all talk of re-regulation. I say now, whilst there is bi-partisan help, is the time to initiate engaged on re-regulation. And now that we've ordinary socialized financial markets, what's next? If it particularly is okay for the government to prop up Wall street, why not single payer wellbeing care? it fairly is a equipment nearing cave in too. and picture that we had $seven hundred billion to allocate. we ought to spend it on colleges, roads & bridges, mass transit, option skill, all varieties of stuff.

Answer 9

Did any one else see Bush talk with his mouth full to PM Tony Blair the other day at a G8 lunch????This guy is MY?? president. Don't think so and I know my Mother raised me better..

Answer 10

Wow, a good job....hmmmm....no I don't think so, sorry. Did you notice that 2/3 of America doesn't approve of the job he's doing? They may be on to something. But, then again, I might be biased because I'm in the group...