Would you object to this practice? Give your views on the above ethical issues, support your answer with reasons.
2006-07-21 14:31:53 · 9 answers · asked by Jack 2 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Biology
Just because someone is poor doesn't mean they shouldn't be able to keep and raise their own children. Love doesn't cost a thing. Wealth doesn't necessarily mean that you will provide a better environment for a child. This is highly unethical and dangerous territory, much like selling organs on the black market. Why don't poor people just start selling their kidneys while they're at it?
2006-07-21 14:35:48 · answer #1 · answered by meowww58 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I've never heard of anyone doing this just because they do not want to be pregnant...most women do it because they cannot carry a baby to term. If the surrogate agrees to do it for the money...then why not. No one is out there twisting the arms of poor women to have someone elses baby. It is their choice, and if they feel it is worth the money then why not.
2006-07-22 01:06:09 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think this would be a individuals decision. I can not imagine carrying my children and then giving them up. However I believe what a women does with her body is her own business. I am not sure about doing it just because someone does not want to carry their own child. I think that it is a really great act of courage when A women carries a child for an infertile couple.
2006-07-21 21:41:09 · answer #3 · answered by harley_baby65 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah it could be. That un-ferti mother may asked for the surrogated-mother to having their child. And exactly the kids later on is not the real ne they have. They have to mention about this thigs later one after their child mature.
2006-07-21 21:40:02 · answer #4 · answered by Double Helix 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that would be really selfish & superficial. I would not support such a thing. I can support surrogacy where the couple are unable to have children through the wife not being able to carry to term.
2006-07-21 22:10:14 · answer #5 · answered by somebrowning 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
its a really spoiled brat kind of thing to say because rich people can do just about anything and then the less well off people would give up anything to survive... in a way you could say that from both sides it is selfish ... but then again its only human nature to be selfish and get what u can ... its the best answer i can give anyway...
hope this helped
2006-07-21 21:36:32 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Most women who want to have kids, want to experience the pregnancy. It's a biological emotional need that comes in fantasy and desires when our biological clock is a tickin.
2006-07-21 21:36:29 · answer #7 · answered by nicole 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That happends all the time... but not wanting to be pregnant is a dumb reason, some poeple can't have children
2006-07-21 21:34:36 · answer #8 · answered by mucoluc 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hmm i don't understand the ?
2006-07-21 21:35:07 · answer #9 · answered by Jessica B 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋