2006-07-21 14:25:39 · 11 answers · asked by jdnmsedsacrasac1 4 in Social Science ➔ Other - Social Science
No, because I already believe that innocent people have been executed and the death penalty should be abolished.
2006-07-21 14:29:14 · answer #1 · answered by Diane D 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
It does change my view of the death penalty because I wouldn't want to be the innocent guy executed for something I didn't commit. As painful as it may be for me to see someone who murdered a family member or friend of mine live in prison for the rest of his/her life, I'd have to take the high road and stand against the death penalty because already too many innocent people have been sent to death row and have later been proven innocent.
2006-07-21 16:42:26 · answer #2 · answered by Mr. Grudge 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have never been pro death penalty.
I think that many people have died without cause. There are many people in prisons that don't belong there.
Thank God that they are using DNA now.
I recently heard a story about a man that had been locked up for 35 years, for rape, and was released due to DNA findings.Many family members were already dead. He missed out on SO much, it made me cry.
I just don't believe that a person's life is for us to take. That should be left in the hands of God.
2006-07-21 14:36:09 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
innocent people get murdered all of the time. it's horrible, but it's been happening for a long time. dna evidence doesn't have to prove that to me.
2006-07-21 14:29:24 · answer #4 · answered by geniusH 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
one million) in all likelihood Sydney 2) This freshman Austin. He replaced into great superb. i'm a jr and hes in basic terms so sweet. i'm taking him lower than my wing. 3) Jacob. I hate him. i am hoping he receives hit by skill of a bus. That entire project replaced into so ******* stupid. Now you get a narrative. i have loved him considering eighth grade and he knew it. yet he had a female friend so i did not bypass after him because i easily comprehend peoples relationships. and then about six months in the past he kept complaining to me about his courting complications and he ended up breaking up at the same time with her. and then he made it look like he loved me. And he kissed me. And we were "courting" yet we weren't. and then even as he wanted to have sex and that i suggested I wasn't waiting he left. 4) Sydney, shes a sturdy chum. 5) Kylie. we've properly-known one yet another considering we were little ones.
2016-12-10 13:17:40 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO but I would not execute anyone without DNA evidence that proved them quilty.....If no DNA then life in prison should be max.
2006-07-21 14:32:10 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It has never happened (that we know) of. In the US that is. It would certainly make you stop and think. At the very least I think it would increase the amount of evidence needed to carry it out.
2006-07-21 14:41:16 · answer #7 · answered by Joel P 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no, i think we should execute but only if there is great evidence of the crime commited by them
2006-07-21 14:30:59 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
there are alot of innocent persons locked up, what to do I do not know.
2006-07-21 14:30:36 · answer #9 · answered by sidekick 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, population control.
2006-07-21 14:29:41 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋