Which movie is more explicit (hence, more violent and twisted or "worse"). "Kill Bill: Volume" or "Kill Bill: Volume 2"?
2006-07-21 13:06:58 · 14 answers · asked by Echelon 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
2 was the most explicit and I liked both
2006-07-21 13:11:17 · answer #1 · answered by Yakuza 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Kill Bill Vol. 1 is more explicit. Lucy Liu cuts a person's head off, and blood comes out like a faucet.
2006-07-21 13:24:51 · answer #2 · answered by southparkrulz1213 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would almost have to say Vol 2. While the actual body count in Vol. 1 is much higher, the extended, drawn out explicit acts of pugilism and bloodshed of Vol. 2 makes it seem more violent to me.
2006-07-21 13:11:07 · answer #3 · answered by beadtheway 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Volume One because she kills these people called Crazy 88's with a samuria sword. but in Volume Two she squeezes an eyeball with her toes.
Just because it's violent doesn't mean that it's not a good film, although one exception is "Hostel". That is quite possibly the worst film ever.
2006-07-21 13:45:34 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Vol 1 in a landslide
2006-07-21 13:09:27 · answer #5 · answered by Chris L 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's a bit of a fine point....I would say 1, but 2 is pretty amazingly violent too.
2006-07-21 13:10:49 · answer #6 · answered by P. M 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The killings are more graphic in the first volume, the second one is more sexual, both are about equal in cursing.
2006-07-21 13:10:09 · answer #7 · answered by jjc92787 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Volume 1 Lucy Lou parts...man! Blood, guts, and blood.
2006-07-21 13:09:01 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Vol. 1.
There is more carnage.
The violence in 2 is more controlled and is mostly back story.
2006-07-21 13:08:23 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Definitely the first one, but both are excellent! Uma Thurman kicks major ***!
2006-07-21 13:12:04 · answer #10 · answered by prettypixie1997 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋