Should President Bush be Impeached??

Question

Impeachment charges were brought against President Clinton for lying.

What about Bush who said "Iraq is an immediate threat--sheltering terrorists and weapons of mass destruction and we have evidence of both," "mission accomplished," "we are turning the corner in Iraq," "the world is a safer place because we invaded Iraq," "we are turning the corner in Iraq," "we are turning the corner in Iraq," "we are....".

All lies, lies, lies...

Answer 1

That should have happened a long time ago. He has done so much damage to this country, that we may never get back to where we were, before he took office. We can only hope that the next president will be able to get us back on the road to recovery. But, it make take several terms of a good president to undo the damage that he has done.

Answer 2

I can't believe there are still people who believe the "wmd" baloney. The architecht behind all of this is Dick (the devil) Cheney. Yes, he personally had articles pertaining to the "correct" intelligence re-routed to him, bypassing Dubya. How on earth can anyone say we shouldn't blame Bush 'cause he didn't know the truth. If our President doesn't know the truth, then we are in a world of hurt. But then he does only dance to the tune Cheney plays and the Republican "do nothing" Congress dances to the same tune. There is no longer bipartisanship, it's Dubya's way or the highway. And I believe I read that someone said we've helped Iraq......oh that's rich! In May and June this year, over 6,000 Iraqi citizens were killed and thousands more are trying to escape the country which is on the verge, if not already knee-deep into a civil war. This doesn't even begin to count the thousands of our own, young, American military who have died or been maimed in this nightmare delusion of "the decider".
Impeach him AND do whatever needs to be done with Cheney, Rumsfeld and the Republican robots in Congress.

Answer 3

Its ineffective, first the President has to commit a impeacheable offense like "treason, bribery, or different severe crimes and misdemeanors . Secondly the approach may take always only to commence up, he may be lengthy lengthy gone out of workplace, before it changed into even all started. Thirdly the democrats mechanically talked about as for it, on the prompt they're able or perhaps acknowledged that they does no longer do it. After the impeachment then the senate may might want to convict him. So no longer gonna ensue. He hasnt damaged any rules, and absolutely there is no reason to question him, he's gonna be lengthy gone in a year, problem about the subsequent president.

Answer 4

Wow you are very dumb. Even clinton and this is pre 9-11 durning his presidency called terrorism the worst threat facing the 21st century. There is a memo from the Senate urging Clinton to war during his admistration signed by Kerry among other prominant retards so its not Bushs fault he trusted american intellegence. Even Iraqi generals said they had them. Turns out the generals didnt know that Sadam was lying to them too. And why didnt Sadam just let weapon inspectors back in then? God these anti-Iraq ppl are so clueless. 17 UN RESOLUTIONS BROKEN dill-hole

Answer 5

He should absolutely be impeached for the ongoing civil liberties violations (eavesdropping, extraordinary rendition), as well as the lies he told to invade Iraq. All we've accomplished in the Middle East is to start a regional (World?) war.

Answer 6

Don't be ridiculous. In the first place, Iraq had WMD's: it used them. Furthermore, five hundred chemical shells (Sarin and mustard gas) have been found, even though fewer than 3% of Iraq's arsenals have been inspected. (Actually, the great bulk of the WMD material -- several thousand tons -- was shipped to Syria in June 2002.) And, even though we aren't done in Iraq, things are better than they were a year ago, and immeasurably better than under Saddam.

Answer 7

I believe he should be without a doubt. He has made a azz out of the United States and his latest mess up was showing his azz at the over seas conference and making a bigger azz out of himself. He is out for himself and could care less about the people. I don't see why he wasn't impeached after Katrina!!

Answer 8

Impeachment would be too good for Bush, Cheney & Co. They should be tried for high treason, and crimes against humanity, and - if convicted, they should face a public firing squad. These people are the most evil, corrupt, incompetent ever to occupy the White House. -RKO-

Answer 9

You need to watch something other than the liberal media and the Bush bashers. We did find weapons of mass destruction and the immediate threat was terrorists since he supported them and help to train them.

Answer 10

Yes! Definitely! Make sure that whoever is to replace him is an improvement in the real system. I think he and a lot of other politicians owe to the System for their alleged benefits; therefore they take their countries to war and end up killing a lot of people by proxy on both sides.