I Didnt Like His Father. But He New What He Was Doing At Least. And Didnt Have To Bye Votes. George W. Bush Didnt Even Win. And Both Elections They Had The Same Problems. And Was The Same State. We All No That His Brother Jeb A Had That Fixed.
2006-07-21 11:57:11 · 6 answers · asked by mks 7-15-02 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
You answered your own question, Geo. H.W. Bush was bad but he looks good next to his son, Geo. W. Bush, who is too dumb to resign in disgrace.
2006-07-21 12:04:46 · answer #1 · answered by Testika Filch Milquetoast 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
His father was much better, but he wasn't anything to brag about. At least he didn't have to rely on cheating and theft in order to win the election. As a Bush though, he had no concept of what a good economy is in this country since we had one of the worst recessions in a long time during his administration. During knucklehead's administration, we're experiencing the largest budget deficit in history. Like father, like son.
One difference - what Pop said "Mission Accomplished" - Desert Storm was over and he brought the troops home. When sonny boy said the same thing, more got killed.
The one that's in power now is not only a disgrace to the state of Texas and the United States in general, but to the world because he keeps trying to make people think he's an intelligent, thinking human being when he's neither.
2006-07-21 13:29:58 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
the two reeked havoc on the middle type !! yet i might choose for Bush Sr a minimum of he knew what might ensue via going into Baghdad "we could have been compelled to occupy Baghdad and, in result, rule Iraq. The coalition might without delay have collapsed, the Arabs deserting it in anger and different allies pulling out besides. under those circumstances, apart from, we have been self-consciously attempting to set a trend for coping with aggression in the submit-chilly conflict international. getting in and occupying Iraq, for that reason unilaterally exceeding the U.N.'s mandate, might have destroyed the precedent of world reaction to aggression we was hoping to examine. Had we long gone the invasion path, the U.S. ought to conceivably nevertheless be an occupying skill in a bitterly unfavorable land. it would have been a dramatically diverse--and doubtless barren--effect." sounds like besides working the CIA and being a one term president, Bush Sr. grew to become right into a a fortune teller, for his very own infant
2016-11-02 12:07:10 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
They are both named George W. Bush,but I still think SR. was better
2006-07-21 12:03:52 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm not sure that there is actually a difference. Jeb seems like the only half way smart one. I bet he wishes he never fixed that first one.
2006-07-21 12:01:17 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I like G.W. much, much better.
2006-07-21 12:08:32 · answer #6 · answered by scruffycat 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋