Do you think that it fair to compare Bush to Hitler? If so, why or why not?

Question

To all you that think that I am suggesting something, read the question twice you dumn fuc*s. Ok

Answer 1

Are you being serious or is this a joke? Just because some or even most people do not like the President does not make him in anyway comparable to Hitler! Are you suggesting that because we invaded Iraq we are Nazis because they invaded western Europe? We are not sweeping through an entire continent wiping out someone who LOOKS different than us... I do not know if you at all keep up with current events but at the time that we went into Iraq there was Intel from England and Russia that Iraq had WMD's, so maybe you should call Blair another Stalin, and Putin another Lenin... and by the way, we did find seren gas... a weapon of mass destruction. Bush may not be a great leader although some would argue that, but he is CERTAINLY no Hitler! Anyone who makes that statement is ignorant

Answer 2

No it is not fair to compare Bush to Hitler. However,
it would be fair to compare Kerry to Neville Chamberlin.

"Chamberlain, Hitler, Mussolini and Daladier, the Prime Minister of France, signed the MÜNICH PACT and agreed that all Czech troops in the Sudetenland would be replaced by German troops. The British hailed Chamberlain -- the French hailed Daladier. While Chamberlain returned to England with a piece of paper in his hand, Hitler was laughing. What Britain and France had shown was their own weakness and this weakness increased Hitler's appetite for even more territory."

Answer 3

I seem to remember an ad with Kerry's face and Hitler's voice in the background. This ad was put out by Bush supporters. I guess neocons would be pretty hypocritical if they complained about Bush being compared to Hitler.
Actually Bush isn't as smart as Hitler. The way he and his supporters are trying to consolidate power in the executive branch, control the media, spy on our own citizens, and label people who think differently as unpatriotic and worse is pretty fascistic. Fascists in Germany burned books. In America they burn Dixie Chicks Cd's

Answer 4

Perfectly fair. Both used their people's love of country to manipulate them into wars of aggression. Both of them have/had regimes that kept a tight relationship with the press to keep control of how much the public is/was exposed to. Both had parties that consistently lied to the people.

I see more similatirties than differences.

Eisenhower's fairwell address as president after WWII (he was a lifelong military man).

"This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence -- economic, political, even spiritual -- is felt in every city, every State house, every office of the Federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society.

In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist."

Answer 5

You can compare anyone to anyone and it's babble.. I would say that the "Bush Administration" has done a great deal of damage around the planet and the fact that human life has been affected by the hundreds of thousands is more fodder for stupid people to quibble about.. The empire is growing .. from superpower to sperpredator isn't a big jump..

Answer 6

Just another moronic democrat question. Read a history book on the subject of Hitler and the Holocaust, then maybe you won't make light of the subject again in your uneducated life.

Answer 7

Did you read my question? I he has done some things that I don't like but to compare him to Hitler is like calling someone who just got a parking ticket a felon. The left uses words like Nazi to promote their hate. People see Bush = Nazi and they take it for granted. It is really kind of sad.

Answer 8

No, Bush doesn't have the credentials to even compare with Hitler. The benchmark is way to high.

Answer 9

No, because Hitler was a criminal for killing a race and President Bush just buds in other countries business.

Answer 10

Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei or


I know libelers can be slow. But once more .



WHAT WAS HITLER ? Other than a murderer.

HE WAS A SOCIALIST !!!!!


The same thing liberals hold so dear to their hearts.


So just who is more like Hitler?