my question is, why do peple want to kill a living being to get the stem cell. adult stem cells do just as much and nobody is killed. im not a republican, but it seems to be a common sense answer. i mean, killing babies to get the stem cell for research is a lot like ripping someones heart out where they stand to see how it pumps. its ridiculous. also, to say something, i admit that cells in a human body r not life, except at conception because its the earliest stage of life. i also admit that it has many uses, but in reality embryonic stem cell research is just murder, and a good alternative is adult stem cell research, which is much more moral. as a note, i normally hate bush, but he was right on this one. i do not want my tax dollars going to the killing of innocent PEOPLE. now if only he could pull our troops back. what do u think on this issue, please be detailed.
2006-07-21 07:51:05 · 3 answers · asked by the fonz 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
The topic is intertwined with the abortion rights movement. To further their agenda it would help to find a breakthrough that can only be supplied from aborted genetic material.
2006-07-22 03:59:19 · answer #1 · answered by CHEVICK_1776 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Well, to start off, there are several points you made here that merit a response. Embryonic stem cell research does not involve "killing babies". There is a word of difference between a live baby and a frozen, days-old embryo that is likely going to be discarded. In this particular scenario, it's difficult to justify NOT conducting the research, given the potential benefits to so many ill people.
Secondly, your comments that "adult stem cells do just as much" is incorrect. Most scientists believe that adult stem cells are more limited in their potential uses, and that embryonic stem cells are much more versatile in terms of forming different types of tissue. This is a big reason why so many are advocating for expanded embryonic stem cell research.
To summarize, embryonic stem cell research has tremendous potential to help millions of patients with very cruel diseases (such as spinal cord injury, Parkinson's disease, diabetes...and the list goes on). While there are valid ethical questions that have been posed, it is hard to say that doing research on embryos that would otherwise be sent to the trash bin is immoral. Weighing all the factors, the argument for embryonic stem cell research is quite strong. That is in part why more than 70% of Americans support it.
2006-07-22 07:35:48 · answer #2 · answered by Michael S 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I thoroughly consider you. i discover it thrilling also that you aren't to any extent further a Republican. i surely am a Democrat and that i'm thoroughly antagonistic to embreyonic stem cellular analyze. If scientists may only settle on to attempting to make advances with man or woman stem cells or twine blood stem cells, lots of the ailments that they so typically web site ought to actual be cured without destroying human existence. that is carefully unethical to create existence only to smash it. Why might want to a human newborn might want to die to maintain someone who has already loved an finished existence. The statement that an embreyonic cellular isn't human existence is preposterous. some day technological understanding will attain the point the position a newborn will have the capacity to live to inform the tale outdoors the womb from even that factor. I hate to say that I help Bush on some thing, yet I actually am satisfied about him vetoing the bill. man or woman stem cellular analyze might want to bypass ahead, yet embreyonic stem cellular analyze is carefully unethical.
2016-10-15 01:25:51 · answer #3 · answered by schwenck 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋