http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-521503032546496626&q=WWIII
2006-07-21 07:37:33 · 17 answers · asked by vituperative facetious wiseass 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Hey Lucas! Good job man! Yes in the 72 Olympics was the beginning of the terroism as we are seeing it today as they murdered the Israelli coach and athhletes! Then Carter tried to have peace but it ultimately failed when the Shah was exiled and Jimmy turned his back on him! The terroists took hold with todays Iranian President being one of the terroists took our people hostage for 444 days! In 93 of course the Trade Center was bombed the first time with 6 dead and many injured. Neither Carter or Clinton really ever stood up to the terroists and that is a fact that liberals do not want to hear! No Islam is not a religion of peace and it does mean to submit! Way to give it to the liberals who I have noticed calling this propaganda. Doesn't it figure? We have to hunt down the terroists and kill the Islamic fascists everywhere they are. Of course I am a conservative and I have enough decency and common sense enough to know who the true enemy is! Thank you for this my friend!
2006-07-21 10:38:59 · answer #1 · answered by toughguy2 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I found that to be a wonderful bit of propaganda. I subscribe to "other" theories about the world's turmoil, including the 93 and 2001 attacks on the WTC and the 2005 London bombings. I think this film is trash. Islam is a religion of peace. Islamic EXTREMISTS are not true Muslims, though the Rapture Right would like for all of America, if not the entire planet, to think so. This among other aspects of the film just anger and hurt me.
2006-07-21 08:13:37 · answer #2 · answered by MishMash [I am not one of your fans] 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Conclusions:
The music did not fit the film at all.
Jimmy Carter was a bum regardless of the middle east, he got attacked by a rabbit for a reason.
This is preachy propaganda film, most people know the reality of some of the leaders in the middle east. The die hard liberals and pacifists aren't going to change their mind because of it.
Using scattered events to judge the entire islamic world is a big mistake. Define your enemy specifically and attack only that enemy. Trying to take on the entire islamic world for a "crusade" would be a bad decision tactically, morally, and spiritually.
2006-07-21 07:47:28 · answer #3 · answered by mike 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah I watched it. Based on the the precursor information regarding radical Islam's war on US and all the attacks dating back to the Munich Olympics, it amplifies the failure of the Bush administration to be prepared for or to prevent the 9/11 attacks and makes me the ineptness of the response more blatantly obvious. As Richard Clarke has documented, he was trying to get a meeting regarding Al queda/Islamic threat for months before 9/11 and never got that meeting -- that administration seemed indifferent to the threat. It makes it obvious that Bush Administration either didn't take threat seriously enough or something else more sinister was going on.
Also, interesting that the film talks about the "Shaw" of Iran -- hmm was that a relative of George Bernard Shaw?
2006-07-21 07:53:36 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
This video and these liberal asnwers clearly shows why liberals are IGNORANT. They CHOOSE to believe this is a right wing scare tactic or propaganda. They CHOOSE to believe in a world where BUSH is more evil and dangerous than the terrorists & terrorist families documented in the video. These liberals are a prime example of how they CAN NOT be trusted with the security of this nation. They are showing us who they really are and that is why they are out of power and will not regain power. They are weak excuses for Americans - but they are allowed to have their disgusting dissenting opinion.
2006-07-21 07:54:04 · answer #5 · answered by therandman 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Right wing propaganda. Jimmy Carter negotiated peace between Israel and Egypt, which still exists to this day.
The Iranian hostages were released while Carter was still president, and arrived home on Reagan's inaugaration day. How does Reagan get the credit for that?
The damage Carter did? Maybe, but why didn't it criticize Reagan for not doing anything after the Beirut bombing of the Marine barracks?
I repeat, right-wing propaganda. Do they expect everyone to be ignorant of history?
2006-07-21 07:49:23 · answer #6 · answered by scott j 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
its time to end war and begin peace .So much death for no reason and without pupose if we do not end this war with-in the world of religion .RELIGION is the key to all the problems and the land is the battle ground .the players are the people supplied by both sides with the middle doing the suffering.
We must put down our weapons and declare peace in cluding just letting them have whatever they want .IF they ever attack us again nuke them the whole place as the only means to an end.BUT we must first leave and stop supplying arms around the world .
2006-07-21 08:15:44 · answer #7 · answered by playtoofast 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think you should also attach a view of what Israelis have done to Palestinians and what America has done in Iraq, only fair. Oh, and by the way, the body count is much higher than what you showed on the other sides.
2006-07-21 07:44:33 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
they will not get it. Liberals are to busy smoking dope and hating being told what to do.... Ops what's going to happen to them if Islamic rule takes over their home..I think we saw some it on your video. Hang the women for forgetting their hats and shoot people for smoking their dope.
Props to you sir on spreading a little truth on the web of lie's
2006-07-21 07:44:53 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
For those of you who believe that the war on terror is nothing more than a scare tactic of the right wing, what would you consider global warming?
2006-07-21 07:43:34 · answer #10 · answered by Boob 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋